Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Metz (2005)
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
H. Waisman, J. Rozenberg, O. Sassi, J. Hourcade (2012)
Peak Oil profiles through the lens of a general equilibrium assessmentEnergy Policy, 48
M. Tavoni, R. Tol (2010)
Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policyClimatic Change, 100
C. Guivarch, R. Crassous, O. Sassi, S. Hallegatte (2009)
The costs of climate policies in a second-best world with labour market imperfectionsClimate Policy, 11
James McFarland, John Reilly, Howard Herzog (2002)
Representing Energy Technologies in Top-down Economic Models Using Bottom-up Information
E. Berndt, D. Wood (1975)
Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for EnergyThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 57
R. Metzger, G. Benford (2001)
Sequestering of Atmospheric Carbon through Permanent Disposal of Crop ResidueClimatic Change, 49
S. Fritz, L. See, M. Velde, Rachel Nalepa, C. Perger, C. Schill, I. Mccallum, D. Schepaschenko, F. Kraxner, Ximing Cai, Xiao Zhang, S. Ortner, R. Hazarika, A. Cipriani, C. Bella, A. Rabia, Alfredo García, Mar'yana Vakolyuk, Kuleswar Singha, M. Beget, S. Erasmi, Franziska Albrecht, B. Shaw, M. Obersteiner (2013)
Downgrading recent estimates of land available for biofuel production.Environmental science & technology, 47 3
J. Hourcade, Mark Jaccard, C. Bataille, Frédéric Ghersif (2006)
Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy JournalThe Energy Journal, 27
D. Vuuren, Elie Bellevrat, A. Kitous, M. Isaac (2010)
Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization ScenariosThe Energy Journal, 31
H. Waisman, C. Guivarch, F. Lecocq (2013)
The transportation sector and low-carbon growth pathways: modelling urban, infrastructure, and spatial determinants of mobilityClimate Policy, 13
S. Bhattacharyya (1996)
Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: a surveyEnergy Economics, 18
J. Swanson (2002)
Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex WorldJournal of the Operational Research Society, 53
M. Frondel, C. Schmidt (2002)
The Capital-Energy Controversy: An Artifact of Cost Shares?The Energy Journal, 23
D. Bunn, E. Larsen (1992)
Sensitivity of reserve margin to factors influencing investment behaviour in the electricity market of England and WalesEnergy Policy, 20
S. Arango, E. Larsen (2011)
Cycles in deregulated electricity markets: Empirical evidence from two decadesEnergy Policy, 39
O. Edenhofer, B. Knopf, T. Barker, Lavinia Baumstark, Elie Bellevrat, B. Château, P. Criqui, M. Isaac, A. Kitous, S. Kypreos, Marian Leimbach, K. Lessmann, Bertrand Magné, S. Scrieciu, H. Turton, D. Vuuren (2010)
The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and CostsThe Energy Journal, 31
D. Jorgenson, B. Fraumeni (1983)
Relative Prices and Technical Change
Mary Finn (2000)
Perfect Competition and the Effects of Energy Price Increases on Economic ActivityJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32
P. Luckow, Marshall Wise, James Dooley, Son Kim (2010)
Biomass Energy for Transport and Electricity: Large Scale Utilization Under Low CO2 Concentration Scenarios
Brian Fisher, N. Nakicenovic, K. Alfsen, J. Corfee-Morlot, K. Riahi (2007)
Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context
Lena Neij (2008)
Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessmentsEnergy Policy, 36
(1993)
Nonlinear dynamics and economics : a historians perspective
F. Olsina, F. Garces, H. Haubrich (2006)
Modeling long-term dynamics of electricity marketsEnergy Policy, 34
R. Sands, Marian Leimbach (2003)
Modeling Agriculture and Land Use in an Integrated Assessment FrameworkClimatic Change, 56
B. Magné, S. Kypreos, H. Turton (2010)
Technology Options for Low Stabilization Pathways with MERGEThe Energy Journal, 31
R. Solow (1956)
A Contribution to the Theory of Economic GrowthQuarterly Journal of Economics, 70
(1997)
Capacity utilization
JI Silk, FL Joutz (1997)
Short and long-run elasticities in US residential electricity demand: a co-integration approachEnergy Econ, 19
F. Ghersi, J. Hourcade (2006)
Macroeconomic Consistency Issues in E3 Modeling: The Continued Fable of the Elephant and the RabbitThe Energy Journal, 27
I. Wing (2008)
The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: Electric power technology detail in a social accounting frameworkEnergy Economics, 30
L. Taylor (1975)
The demand for electricity: a surveyThe Bell Journal of Economics, 6
C. Azar, K. Lindgren, E. Larson, K. Möllersten (2006)
Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the AtmosphereClimatic Change, 74
J. Shepherd, S. Rayner (2009)
Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty
JC Hourcade, M Jaccard, C Bataille, F Ghersi (2006)
Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challengesEnergy J, 2
N. Nakicenovic, J. Alcamo, Ged Davis, B. Vries, J. Fenhann, S. Gaffin, K. Gregory, A. Grubler, T. Jung, T. Kram, E. Rovere, L. Michaelis, S. Mori, T. Morita, W. Pepper, Hugh Pitcher, L. Price, K. Riahi, A. Roehrl, H. Rogner, Alexei Sankovski, M. Schlesinger, P. Shukla, Steven Smith, R. Swart, S. Rooijen, Nadejda Victor, Z. Dadi (2000)
Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
H. Waisman, C. Guivarch, F. Grazi, J. Hourcade (2012)
The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresightClimatic Change, 114
Monique Hoogwijka, A. Faaija, Bert Vriesb, Wim Turkenburga (2009)
Exploration of regional and global cost–supply curves of biomass energy from short-rotation crops at abandoned cropland and rest land under four IPCC SRES land-use scenariosBiomass & Bioenergy, 33
A. Schäfer, D. Victor (2000)
The future mobility of the world populationTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 34
A Atkeson, PJ Kehoe (1999)
Models of energy use: putty-putty versus putty-clayAm Econ Rev, 89
Escenarios Principales, Otros, Escenarios Referidos, EN Weo, Y. Escenario, Inputs Para, LA Modelización (1977)
World Energy OutlookElectronics and Power, 23
O. Edenhofer, C. Carraro, J. Hourcade (2012)
On the economics of decarbonization in an imperfect worldClimatic Change, 114
L. Clarke, P. Kyle, M. Wise, K. Calvin, J. Edmonds, Son Kim, M. Placet, S. Smith (2009)
CO 2 Emissions Mitigation and Technological Advance: An Updated Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios
H. Haberl, T. Beringer, S. Bhattacharya, K. Erb, M. Hoogwijk (2010)
The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050 considering sustainability constraintsCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2
A. Ford (1999)
Cycles in competitive electricity markets: a simulation study of the western United StatesEnergy Policy, 27
(2013)
Construction de matrices entres-sorties en indicateurs physiques et en valeur montaire pour les modles dquilibre gnral hybrides: application lconomie brsilienne
M. Wise, K. Calvin, A. Thomson, L. Clarke, B. Bond‐Lamberty, R. Sands, Steven Smith, A. Janetos, J. Edmonds (2009)
Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and EnergyScience, 324
J. Silk (1997)
Short and long-run elasticities in US residential electricity demand: a co-integration approachFuel and Energy Abstracts
(2008)
The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production
A. Schäfer (2012)
Introducing behavioral change in transportation into energy/economy/environment models, 2013
L. Chapman (2007)
Transport and climate change: a reviewJournal of Transport Geography, 15
R. Sands, Sebastian Miller, Man-Keun Kim (2005)
The Second Generation Model: Comparison of SGM and GTAP Approaches to Data Development
A. Atkeson, P. Kehoe (1994)
Models of Energy Use: Putty-Putty Versus Putty-ClayNBER Working Paper Series
Sustaining low CO 2 emissions pathways to 2100 may rely on electricity production from biomass. We analyze the economic effect of the availability of biomass resources and technologies with and without CCS within a general equilibrium framework. We assess the robustness of bioenergy with and without CCS for reaching the RCP 3.7 target with the hybrid model Imaclim-R. Global consumption is affected by the absence of CCS or biomass options, and biomass is shown to be a possible technological answer to the absence of CCS. As the use of biomass on a large scale might prove unsustainable, we show that early action is a strategy to reduce the need for biomass and enhance economic growth in the long term.
Climatic Change – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 5, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.