Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1982)
Judgment under uncertainty: Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
P. Faulkner (2000)
The Social Character of Testimonial WarrantJournal of Philosophy, 97
A. Gopnik, A. N. Meltzoff (1997)
Learning, Development and Conceptual Change
A. Tversky (1977)
Features of SimilarityPsychological Review, 84
S. Carey (1985)
Conceptual Change in Childhood
M. Dummett (1993)
The Seas of Language
L. Ross, C. Anderson (1982)
Judgment under uncertainty: Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments
M. Welbourne, C. Coady (1994)
Testimony: A Philosophical Study.History and Theory, 33
R. Audi (1997)
The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and JustificationAmerican Philosophical Quarterly, 34
M. Webb (1993)
Why I Know About as Much as You: A Reply to HardwigThe Journal of Philosophy, 90
J. Hardwig (1985)
Epistemic DependenceThe Journal of Philosophy, 82
(1764)
An Inquiry into the Mind on the Principles of Common Sense
H. Weiner, R. Nisbett, L. Ross (1981)
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76
D. Owen (1987)
Hume versus Price on Miracles and Prior ProbabilitiesThe Philosophical Quarterly, 37
P. Faulkner (2000)
The Social Character of Testimonial KnowledgeThe Journal of Philosophy, 97
J. Adler (1994)
Testimony, Trust and KnowingThe Journal of Philosophy, 91
A. Gopnik, A. Meltzoff (1997)
Words, thoughts, and theories
R. Nisbett (1981)
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
David Owen (1987)
Hume Versus Price on Miracles and Prior Probabilities: Testimony and the Bayesian CalculationThe Philosophical Quarterly, 37
H. Kornblith (1993)
Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology
(1973)
On the Psychology of Prediction
Paul Thagard (1991)
Epistemology and cognitionErkenntnis, 34
P. Faulkner (1998)
David Hume’s Reductionist Epistemology of TestimonyPacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79
L. Ross, C. Anderson (1982)
Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
M. Root (2001)
HUME ON THE VIRTUES OF TESTIMONYAmerican Philosophical Quarterly, 38
S. Gelman, E. Markman (1986)
Categories and induction in young childrenCognition, 23
J. Adler (1994)
Testimony, trust, knowingThe Journal of Philosophy, 91
Leona Schauble, S. Vosniadou, A. Ortony (1991)
Similarity and Analogical ReasoningEducational Researcher
Elizabeth Fricker (1995)
Telling and Trusting: Reductionism andAnti- Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony
T. Burge (1993)
Content PreservationPhilosophical Review, 102
P. Faulkner (1998)
Hume's Reductionist Theory of TestimonyPacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79
T. Williamson (1997)
Knowledge as EvidenceMind, 106
C. A. J. Coady (1973)
Testimony and ObservationAmerican Philosophical Quarterly, 10
Elizabeth Fricker (1995)
Critical NoticeTelling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of TestimonyMind, 104
M. Dummett (1994)
Testimony and Memory
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1973)
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 5
T. Reid (1764)
The Works of Thomas Reid
David Hume, L. Selby-Bigge, P. Nidditch (1975)
Enquiries: Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals
The assumption that we largely lack reasons for accepting testimony has dominated its epistemology. Given the further assumption that whatever reasons we do have are insufficient to justify our testimonial beliefs, many conclude that any account of testimonial knowledge must allow credulity to be justified. In this paper I argue that both of these assumptions are false. Our responses to testimony are guided by our background beliefs as to the testimony as a type, the testimonial situation, the testifier's character and the truth of the proposition testified to. These beliefs provide reasons for our responses. Thus, we usually do have reasons, in the sense of propositions believed, for accepting testimony and these reasons can provide evidence for the testimonial beliefs we form.
Synthese – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 19, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.