Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor J Youth Adolescence (2008) 37:759–760 DOI 10.1007/s10964-008-9285-8 Maureen Drysdale Æ B. J. Rye Published online: 4 April 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Dear Editor non-psychology students would not be able to follow the psychological methodology and statistics. We edited out In Volume 36, Hollenstein (2007) reviews Taking Sides: what we felt was superfluous for critical assessments by Clashing Views in Adolescence. We found the review very readers. A student who is particularly keen has the ability constructive and thoughtful. We would like to add a few to access the full resource as the reference is available (this points to highlight the nature of the book and note its is in contrast to some other Taking Sides texts). strengths in light of the book’s purpose. We also agree that many of the sources in Taking Sides The text is part of the Taking Sides series published by were drawn from ‘‘non-scientific… or have clear political or McGraw-Hill. That series is interdisciplinary. As a result, religious perspectives ….’’ We purposefully sought these we designed the text and worded the guiding questions so other perspectives and did not present clashing views from that they would appeal to audiences beyond undergraduate only http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Youth and Adolescence Springer Journals

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/letter-to-the-editor-9lMO5ue6MX

References (2)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Psychology; Child and School Psychology; Clinical Psychology; Health Psychology; Law and Psychology; History of Psychology; Psychology, general
ISSN
0047-2891
eISSN
1573-6601
DOI
10.1007/s10964-008-9285-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

J Youth Adolescence (2008) 37:759–760 DOI 10.1007/s10964-008-9285-8 Maureen Drysdale Æ B. J. Rye Published online: 4 April 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Dear Editor non-psychology students would not be able to follow the psychological methodology and statistics. We edited out In Volume 36, Hollenstein (2007) reviews Taking Sides: what we felt was superfluous for critical assessments by Clashing Views in Adolescence. We found the review very readers. A student who is particularly keen has the ability constructive and thoughtful. We would like to add a few to access the full resource as the reference is available (this points to highlight the nature of the book and note its is in contrast to some other Taking Sides texts). strengths in light of the book’s purpose. We also agree that many of the sources in Taking Sides The text is part of the Taking Sides series published by were drawn from ‘‘non-scientific… or have clear political or McGraw-Hill. That series is interdisciplinary. As a result, religious perspectives ….’’ We purposefully sought these we designed the text and worded the guiding questions so other perspectives and did not present clashing views from that they would appeal to audiences beyond undergraduate only

Journal

Journal of Youth and AdolescenceSpringer Journals

Published: Apr 4, 2008

There are no references for this article.