Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Natale, F. Velardi, C. Visone (2001)
Modelling and compensation of hysteresis for magnetostrictive actuators2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556), 2
P. Ge, M. Jouaneh (1995)
Modeling hysteresis in piezoceramic actuatorsPrecision Engineering-journal of The International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 17
R. Gorbet, David Wang, K. Morris (1998)
Preisach model identification of a two-wire SMA actuatorProceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146), 3
I. Mayergoyz, G. Friedman (1988)
Generalized Preisach model of hysteresisIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 24
Ralph Smith (1997)
Modeling techniques for magnetostrictive actuators, 3041
M. Sablik, D. Jiles (1988)
A model for hysteresis in magnetostrictionJournal of Applied Physics, 64
Yuan Zhu-zhi (2006)
Modeling and Control of Hysteretic Systems Based on Preisach ModelControl Engineering of China
Y. Bernard, E. Mendes, F. Bouillault (2002)
Dynamic hysteresis modeling based on Preisach modelIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 38
E. Torre, J. Oti, G. Kádár (1990)
Preisach modeling and reversible magnetizationIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 26
T. Doong, I. Mayergoyz (1985)
On numerical implementation of hysteresis modelsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 21
D. Davino, C. Natale, S. Pirozzi, C. Visone (2005)
A fast compensation algorithm for real-time control of magnetostrictive actuatorsJournal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 290
Xiaobo Tan, R. Venkataraman, P. Krishnaprasad (2001)
Control of hysteresis: theory and experimental results, 4326
A. Howson, C. Pearson (1975)
Handbook of Applied MathematicsThe Mathematical Gazette, 59
M. Dapino, Ralph Smith, A. Flatau (2000)
Structural magnetic strain model for magnetostrictive transducersIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 36
This paper presents two numerical realization of Preisach model by Density Function Method (DFM) and F Function Method (FFM) for a giant magnetostrictive actuator (GMA). Experiment and simulation showed that FFM is better than DFM for predicting precision of hysteresis loops. Lagrange bilinear interpolation algorithm is used in Preisach numerical realization to enhance prediction performance. A set of hysteresis loops and higher order reversal curves are predicted and experimentally verified. The good agreement between the measured and predicted curves shows that the classical Preisach model is effective for modelling the quasi-static hysteresis of the GMA.
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.