Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Landis, G. Peace, M. Scharberg, S. Branz, J. Spencer, R. Ricci, S. Zumdahl, D. Shaw (1998)
The New Traditions Consortium: Shifting from a Faculty-Centered Paradigm to a Student-Centered ParadigmJournal of Chemical Education, 75
Division Earth (2003)
BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists
J. Walters (1991)
Role-playing analytical chemistry laboratories. Part 1: structural and pedagogical ideasAnalytical Chemistry, 63
J. Bransford, Ann Brown, R. Cocking (2000)
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded Edition.
O. Runquist, Sylvia Kerr (2005)
Are We Serious about Preparing Chemists for the 21St Century Workplace or Are We Just Teaching ChemistryJournal of Chemical Education, 82
(1997)
Curricular developments in the analytical sciences: a report from the workshops (October 28–30
T. Wenzel (1998)
Peer Reviewed: Cooperative Group Learning in Undergraduate Analytical ChemistryAnalytical Chemistry, 70
D. Burland, M. Doyle, M. Rogers, T. Masciangioli (2004)
Preparing Chemists and Chemical Engineers for A Globally Oriented Workforce
J. Spencer (1999)
New Directions in Teaching Chemistry: A Philosophical and Pedagogical BasisJournal of Chemical Education, 76
(1996)
Shaping the future: new expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (NSF 96–139)
C. Larive (2004)
Problem-based learning in the analytical chemistry laboratory courseAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 380
T. Wenzel (1995)
A new approach to undergraduate analytical chemistryAnalytical Chemistry, 67
Anal Bioanal Chem (2008) 392:1–8 DOI 10.1007/s00216-008-2240-4 ABCS OF TEACHING ANALYTICAL SCIENCE Theme-based modular approach for delivering the undergraduate analytical chemistry curriculum Michael Samide & Olujide Akinbo Published online: 9 July 2008 Springer-Verlag 2008 Introduction and others. The commonalities of these approaches lie in their philosophy of active student participation in the entire Since the later part of the twentieth century, educational educational process of teaching and learning [3]. focus has shifted from acquisition of literacy skills only There has been much debate on the strengths and the (simple reading, writing, and calculating skills) to inclusion flaws of these two pedagogical approaches. For example, a of critical reading and thinking, clear and persuasive strength of the traditional approach is its focus on content communication, and problem-solving skills [1]. In 1996, coverage and grounding in the fundamentals. However, in the Advisory Committee to the National Science Founda- the process it inadvertently overlooks the development of tion Directorate for Education and Human Resources the thought process (critical thinking) and professional released a report of the review of undergraduate education skills, which are both important for the student’s future in science, mathematics, and engineering titled Shaping the endeavors in the chemical industry
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 9, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.