Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Bateson ([1902] 1928)
Scientific Papers of William Bateson
DR. Fisher (1928)
The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent MutationsThe American Naturalist, 62
B. Lewin (2000)
Genes VII
D. Allchin (2003)
Scientific myth-conceptions†Science Education, 87
W.B. Provine (1985)
Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology
E. Keller, E. Lloyd (1994)
Keywords in evolutionary biology
D. Haraway (1989)
Primate Visions
J. Kaplan, M. Pigliucci (2001)
Genes `for’ Phenotypes: A Modern History ViewBiology and Philosophy, 16
S. Schwartz (2002)
Characters as units and the case of the presence and absence hypothesisBiology and Philosophy, 17
D. West (1977)
Melanism in Biston (Lepidoptera: geometridae) in the rural central appalachiansHeredity, 39
M. Foucault (1970)
The archaeology of knowledgeSocial Science Information, 9
S. Wright (1968–69)
Evolution and the Genetics of Populations
T. Morgan (1917)
The Theory of the GeneThe American Naturalist, 51
H. Muller (1932)
Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations., 1
R. Skipper (2002)
The persistence of the R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright controversyBiology and Philosophy, 17
M. Donovan (1997)
The Vocabulary of Biology and the Problem of Semantics.The journal of college science teaching, 26
M. Simmons (1988)
Sewall Wright and Evolutionary BiologyThe Journal of Higher Education, 59
M. Majerus (1998)
Melanism: Evolution in Action
(1999)
Allchin’s mistake
G. Price (1995)
The nature of selectionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 175
A. Goldman (1999)
Knowledge in a Social World
J. Bauer
Genotype and Phenotype.Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 40
S. Otto, D. Bourguet (1999)
Balanced Polymorphisms and the Evolution of DominanceThe American Naturalist, 153
L. Darden (1991)
Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics
O. Mayo, R. Bürger (1997)
THE EVOLUTION OF DOMINANCE: A THEORY WHOSE TIME HAS PASSED?Biological Reviews, 72
T. By, Aloha Hannah (1950)
Concerning artificial crossing in Pisum sativum.Genetics, 35 5 2
(1991)
Mechanisms Mendel never knew
S. Oyama (2000b)
Evolution's Eye
C. Clarke, P. Sheppard (1963)
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MAJOR GENES AND POLYGENES IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE MIMETIC PATTERNS OF PAPILIO DARDANUSEvolution, 17
K. Mikkola (1984)
Dominance relations among the melanic forms of Biston Betularius and Odontopera Bidentata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae)Heredity, 52
H.B.D. Kettlewell (1973)
The Evolution of Melanism: The Study of Recurring Necessity; with Special Reference to Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera
A. Tobin, J. Dusheck (1997)
Asking About Life
(1926)
toptera bidentata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae)
(1999)
Alleles in CD4
(1969)
Biology, 2d ed
H. Vries (1950)
Concerning the law of segregation of hybrids.Genetics, 35 5 2
H.J. Muller (1932)
Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics
E. Lander, R. Weinberg (2000)
Genomics: journey to the center of biology.Science, 287 5459
S. Oyama (2000)
Evolution's eye: A systems view of the biology-culture divide.
C. Clarke, P. Sheppard (1960)
The evolution of dominance under disruptive selectionHeredity, 14
W. Klug, M. Cummings (1999)
Concepts of Genetics
E.B. Ford (1964)
Ecology Genetics
H. Orr (1991)
A test of Fisher's theory of dominance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88 24
F. Trocchio (1991)
Mendel's experiments: A reinterpretationJournal of the History of Biology, 24
Norman Rothwell (1976)
Understanding Genetics: A Molecular Approach
K. Sterelny, P. Kitcher (1988)
The return of the GeneThe Journal of Philosophy, 85
H. Kettlewell (1959)
Darwin's missing evidence.Scientific American, 200 3
N. Campbell, J.B. Reece, L.G. Mitchell (1999)
Biology
V. McKusick (1997)
Mendelian Inheritance in Man: A Catalog of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders
K. Schaffner (1994)
Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine
Fisher - Sewall Wright controversy and its influence upon modern evolutionary biology
E. Lander, R. Weinberg (2000)
Journey to the Center of BiologyScience, 287
A. Wilkie (1994)
The molecular basis of genetic dominance.Journal of Medical Genetics, 31
S. Oyama, B. Smith, E. Weintraub, R. Lewontin (2000)
The Ontogeny of Information
D. Hull (1974)
Philosophy Of Biological Science
J. Lawler, G. Lakoff, Mark Johnson (1981)
Metaphors We Live byLanguage, 59
M. Bix, R. Locksley (1998)
Independent and epigenetic regulation of the interleukin-4 alleles in CD4+ T cells.Science, 281 5381
D. Allchin (2002)
Mutating Concepts, Evolving Disciplines: Genetics, Medicineand Society
R. Berry (1965)
Teach Yourself Genetics
R. Lewontin (2001)
Genotype and Phenotype
E. Ford (1955)
Polymorphism and taxonomyHeredity, 9
R. Fisher (1928)
Two Further Notes on the Origin of DominanceThe American Naturalist, 62
(1902)
Experiments in plant hybridisation [ translation of Mendel ]
R. Falk (2001)
The Rise and Fall of DominanceBiology and Philosophy, 16
J. Naylor, J. Benkendorf (1996)
Mendelian inheritance in man: A catalog of human genes and genetic disordersReproductive Toxicology, 10
D. Allchin (2000)
Mending Mendelism, 62
B. Kettlewell (1973)
The Biston Affair. (Book Reviews: The Evolution of Melanism. The Study of a Recurring Necessity. With Special Reference to Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera)Science
Mendel ’ s law concerning the behavior of progeny in varietal hybrids ( Eng . trans . )
N. Katsanis, S. Ansley, José Badano, E. Eichers, R. Lewis, B. Hoskins, P. Scambler, W. Davidson, P. Beales, J. Lupski (2001)
Triallelic Inheritance in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome, a Mendelian Recessive DisorderScience, 293
The concept of dominance poses several dilemmas. First, while entrenched in genetics education, the metaphor of dominance promotes several misconceptions and misleading cultural perspectives. Second, the metaphors of power, prevalence and competition extend into science, shaping assumptions and default concepts. Third, because genetic causality is complex, the simplified concepts of dominance found in practice are highly contingent or inconsistent. The conceptual problems are illustrated in the history of studies on the evolution of dominance. Conceptual clarity may be fostered, I claim, by viewing diploid organisms as diphenic and by framing genetic causality modestly through individual alleles and their corresponding haplophenotypes.
Biology & Philosophy – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 21, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.