Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2003)
Review of research assessment: Report by Sir Gareth Roberts to the UK funding bodies. http://www.ra-review.ac.uk/reports/roberts.asp
K. Alfredo, Hillary Hart (2011)
The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What?Science and Engineering Ethics, 17
J. Loadsman (2009)
Plagiarism: transparency required.Science, 325 5942
Miguel Roig (2009)
Plagiarism: consider the context.Science, 325 5942
(2009)
The insider's guide to plagiarismNature Medicine, 15
The issue of plagiarism—claiming credit for work that is not one’s own, rightly, continues to cause concern in the academic community. An analysis is presented that shows the effects that may arise from metrics-based assessments of research, when credit for an author’s outputs (chiefly publications) is given to an institution that did not support the research but which subsequently employs the author. The incentives for what is termed here “institutional plagiarism” are demonstrated with reference to the UK Research Assessment Exercise in which submitting units of assessment are shown in some instances to derive around twice the credit for papers produced elsewhere by new recruits, compared to papers produced ‘in-house’.
Science and Engineering Ethics – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 28, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.