It is frequently asserted that the 1856 Companies Act, in removing the mandatory accounting and auditing requirements of the 1844 Companies Act, reflects laissez-faire principles. This paper examines the effects of unlimited and limited liability on investors, and the extent to which accounting publicity benefited different types of investors. It concludes that the “permissiveness” of the 1856 legislation was not neutral, but favoured large investors. It was only when mandatory accounting disclosure was perceived as serving the interests of this group that it began to be viewed more favourably by legislators.
UK joint stock companies legislation 1844-1900: accounting publicity and ìmercantile cautionî
Abstract
It is frequently asserted that the 1856 Companies Act, in removing the mandatory accounting and auditing requirements of the 1844 Companies Act, reflects laissez-faire principles. This paper examines the effects of unlimited and limited liability on investors, and the extent to which accounting publicity benefited different types of investors. It concludes that the “permissiveness” of the 1856 legislation was not neutral, but favoured large investors. It was only when mandatory accounting disclosure was perceived as serving the interests of this group that it began to be viewed more favourably by legislators.Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.
/lp/sage/uk-joint-stock-companies-legislation-1844-1900-accounting-publicity-yWyaRE9Afw
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Preview Only
UK joint stock companies legislation 1844-1900: accounting publicity and ìmercantile cautionî
Maltby,Josephine
Follow Accounting History
, Volume 3 (1): 9
SAGE – May 1, 1998
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
