Letter to the Editor
Abstract
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Gary R. Brown RT Environmental Services, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA July 21, 2003 Dear Sir: The paper by D. A. Belluck (International Journal of Toxicology 22:109–128, 2003) provides an excellent review of what is known about the toxicology associated with arsenic in soils. However, intensive work in testing New Jersey sites and applying new bioavailability testing methodologies provides a clearer picture of the real risk situation. Risk and bioavailability are to a large degree associated with the matrix–is the soil natural background arsenic or is it from a surface spill or release (including atmospheric deposition)? Arsenic in soils tend to have higher bioavailability if the arsenic is from atmospheric deposition or is from lead arsenate application to soils. The same would likely be the case for soil impacted by arsenic treated wood. However, this is not the case with all soils we have tested containing natural background levels associated with soils and the related geologic substrates. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for the last 5 years has maintained a database of such sites, and all soil testing results at sites with elevated arsenic are judged as to whether there has been a