Bookmark

Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production

Guggenheim, Michael
History of the Human Sciences , Volume 25 (1) SAGEFeb 1, 2012

Preview Only

Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production

Abstract

How has sociology framed places of knowledge production and what is the specific power of the laboratory for this history? This article looks in three steps at how sociology and Science and Technology Studies (STS) have historically framed the world as laboratory. First, in early sociology, the laboratory was an important metaphor to conceive of sociology as a scientific enterprise. In the 1950s, the trend reversed and with the emergence of a ‘qualitative sociology’, sociology was seen in opposition to laboratory work. With the ascent of laboratory studies, the laboratory perspective was again applied to many fields, including sociology itself. Based on a definition of a laboratory as aiming at placeless knowledge and being inconsequential this article argues that the two waves of laboratorization were metaphorical and did not really turn the world into a laboratory. Instead, two alternative concepts, those of the unilatory and the locatory, are proposed to gain a more precise understanding of some of these metaphorical uses of the term ‘laboratory’.
Loading next page...

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.

 
/lp/sage/laboratizing-and-de-laboratizing-the-world-changing-sociological-WHZVtC72KT
Title
Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production
Author(s)
Guggenheim, Michael
Journal
History of the Human Sciences , Volume 25 (1) SAGE – Feb 1, 2012
Publisher
Sage Publications
Copyright
© 2012 by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0952-6951
eISSN
1461-720X
D.O.I.
10.1177/0952695111422978
Publisher site
Get PDF