Subscribe to thousands of academic journals for just $40/month
Read and share the articles you need for your research, all in one place.

Editorial Comment

Group & Organization Management , Volume 32 (3): 259 – Jun 1, 2007

Details

Publisher
Sage Publications
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by SAGE Publications
ISSN
1059-6011
eISSN
1059-6011
D.O.I.
10.1177/1059601107303290
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Preview Only

Expand Tray Hide Tray

Editorial Comment

Abstract

Alison M.Konrad University of Western Ontario he lead article in this issue of Group & Organization Management (GOM) T b y Tjosvold and Su introduces the concept of constructive controversy into the emotion management literature. Constructive controversy is the open- minded discussion of opposing perspectives for mutual benefit. Based on diary surveys of 101 employees, the authors conclude that constructive controversy is a useful tool for maintaining good working relationships in the face of dif- ficult emotions. The second article by Scott and Colquitt tests whether individual differ- ence variables moderate the impact of organizational justice on several important behaviors. Findings indicate that exchange ideology, defined as an individual difference in adherence to the norm of reciprocity and the likeli- hood of reciprocating in an exchange relationship, was a significant moder- ator of the justice—outcome relationship. The narrowly focused individual difference of exchange ideology was also more impactful on this relation- ship than the broader Big Five variables were. The third article by Paré and Tremblay describes a study of high involve- ment human resource practices and their impact on information technology professionals. Data from 394 respondents showed that non-monetary recog- nition, competency development, fair rewards and information
Loading next page...

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.

 
/lp/sage/editorial-comment-LMgb438KI2