Instant Access to the Journals you Need

Read Online + Print Articles, for just $40 a month.

Start Your Free Trial

The Relationship between Psychology and Economics.

The Relationship between Psychology and Economics.


During the last twenty years there has been substantial progress in the development of economic psychology. By now, economists in academic institutions as well as in business and government have become accustomed to regard studies of psychological variables as contributions to the understanding of economic processes. Psychologists, however, seem to be less aware of research in economic psychology than economists, although such research may contribute substantially to psychological knowledge. In the past, many writings in economic psychology have been addressed to economists and have appeared in economic publications because the need for such material has been more pronounced in economic than in psychological research. Moreover, to the practitioners of economic psychology, it appeared more straightforward to address themselves to such economic problems as reactions to income and price changes or factors determining the demand for homes and automobiles than to analyze motivation, habit formation, and group belonging in the area of spending and saving. In either case the central problems were the same, only the labeling differed. The belief that economic psychology is applied psychology often makes for difficulties in understanding. It is sometimes thought that established theorems of psychology can clarify the problems inherent in, say, inflation or business cycles. If this were true, economic psychology might serve to enhance the collective ego of psychologists and raise the income of some psychologists who might be called in as consultants on economic problems, but it would hardly contribute to psychological theory. But economic psychology is not applied psychology. Even a related, somewhat broader view appears to be insufficient, namely, that economic behavior can serve as a testing ground for psychological generalizations and hypotheses originally developed about noneconomic behavior. We shall attempt to show that studies of spending, saving, investing, and the like can contribute to the development of knowledge of motives, habits, groups, and other areas of psychology. Furthermore, we shall attempt to show that some important psychological problems are more susceptible to study through analysis of economic behavior than through work in areas more traditional to psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved)
Loading next page...

You're reading a free preview. Subscribe to read or print the entire article.

And millions more from thousands of peer-reviewed journals, for just $40/month.

Start Your Free Trial

What content is in DeepDyve?

  • Read and share from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.
  • All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

Rent Scholarly Articles?

  • Read the full article in your browser.
  • Each month you can print 20 pages for free.
  • Access all of your rentals from the cloud anywhere you have an internet connection.
  • Beautiful reading experience – Full charts and figures, just like the PDF.
  • Read as much as you'd like - whenever you'd like.

Happy Users

“In one word renting from DeepDyve is FANTASTIC!!! ... 99% of the time I only need access to an article for a month or so, so renting the articles is perfect for me.”

Adam S.

“Thanks for a great service! For an unaffiliated science blogger like myself this is like a dream come true.”

Seppo P.

“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”

Daniel C.

“Let me seize this opportunity and congratulate you on the service you are rendering to the scientific community.”

Joao B.