Bookmark

Substitutes for Procedural Fairness

Ullrich, Johannes; Christ, Oliver; van Dick, Rolf
Journal of Applied Psychology , Volume 94 (1): 235 PsycARTICLES®Jan 1, 2009

Preview Only

Substitutes for Procedural Fairness

Abstract

This article extends research on leader procedural fairness as well as the social identity model of leadership effectiveness (SIMOL) by demonstrating that leader prototypicality can act as a substitute for procedural fairness. Although procedural fairness in general and voice in particular have been found to have a robust positive influence on leader endorsement, the authors showed in an experimental scenario study and a correlational field study that the influence of voice on leader endorsement is substantially reduced when leaders are perceived as prototypical for the group that they lead and followers are highly identified with their group. Additionally, supportive of predictions of the SIMOL, leader prototypicality interacted with follower identification in predicting leader endorsement, such that prototypicality had a positive effect on leader endorsement, which was enhanced among high identifiers. Overall, these results suggest that leaders who are attuned to their followers' group identity can afford to go it alone, for the better or the worse.
Loading next page...
1 Page

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.

 
/lp/psycarticles-reg/substitutes-for-procedural-fairness-QKAjbk0jq2
Title
Substitutes for Procedural Fairness
Author(s)
Ullrich, Johannes; Christ, Oliver; van Dick, Rolf
Journal
Journal of Applied Psychology , Volume 94 (1): 235 PsycARTICLES® – Jan 1, 2009
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by American Psychological Association
ISSN
0021-9010
eISSN
1939-1854
D.O.I.
10.1037/a0012936
Publisher site
Get PDF