“Woah! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

Correlates of the opinions about mental illness scale

Correlates of the opinions about mental illness scale

Abstract

Journal of Consulting Psychology 1964, Vol. 28, No. 1, 94 CORRELATES OF THE OPINIONS ABOUT MENTAL ILLNESS SCALE : M. POWELL LAWTON 2 Norristown State Hospital, Norristown, Pennsylvania Cohen and Struening (1962) found various demographic correlates for their Opinions about Mental Illness (OMI) scales, as well as low intercorrelations among its 5 factors. An attempt was made to demonstrate relationships between these factors and other characteristics of a group of 72 psychiatric aides chosen by ward physicians by virtue of the doctors' being familiar with their work. Data were available for each aide on (a) the OMI; (6) the Leary Interpersonal Checklist (ICL) filled out for Self, Ideal Self, Average Aide, Ideal Aide, and Average Mental Patient; (c) the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS); (d) Therapeutic versus Custodial Role Conception scores for 32 of the sample; (e) sex, age, education, and years of service as an aide. Pearsonian r's were computed among OMI scales and between OMI scales and all other variables. Intercorrelations among OMI factor scales followed the general direction of Cohen and Struening's samples, but in some instances were higher (Authoritarianism correlated --.41 with Benevolence, .44 with Social Restrictiveness, and --.43 with Interpersonal Etiology; Benevolence correlated
Loading next page...
 
/lp/psycarticles-reg/correlates-of-the-opinions-about-mental-illness-scale-MuvM8pXL0n

You're reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

And millions more from thousands of peer-reviewed journals, for only $40/month.

Get 2 Weeks Free

To be the best researcher, you need access to the best research

  • With DeepDyve, you can stop worrying about how much articles cost, or if it's too much hassle to order — it's all at your fingertips. Your research is important and deserves the top content.
  • Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.
  • All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

Stop missing out on the latest updates in your field

  • We’ll send you automatic email updates on the keywords and journals you tell us are most important to you.
  • There is a lot of content out there, so we help you sift through it and stay organized.