Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

What is World Literature? (review)

What is World Literature? (review) WHAT IS WORLD LITERATURE? By David Damrosch.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003. xiii + 324 pp. Cloth $65.00, paper $19.95. "He has taken all culture for his province," Randall Jarrell wrote of Ezra Pound, "and is naturally a little provincial about it." It is a good joke, and will bear some analysis. How could Pound, an American who was interested in the old and new literatures of Europe as well as those of ancient China and more recent Japan, be provincial? If Pound was provincial, who wasn't? The implied answer, of course, lies in the approach. Pound wasn't provincial about the works he chose to read, only about the way he chose to read them. Something of the same suspicion of provinciality attaches itself, for many of us, to the idea of world literature. We fall in love, in David Damrosch's phrase, "with a body of work from another time and place" (158), and we keep falling in love with different works and bodies of work. We love the literature of the world (love much of what we have managed to read of it, in its first language or in translation), but we are not sure world literature is http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Literature Studies Penn State University Press

What is World Literature? (review)

Comparative Literature Studies , Volume 41 (1) – Mar 4, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/what-is-world-literature-review-0TG485cxcb

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by The Pennsylvania State University.
ISSN
1528-4212
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

WHAT IS WORLD LITERATURE? By David Damrosch.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003. xiii + 324 pp. Cloth $65.00, paper $19.95. "He has taken all culture for his province," Randall Jarrell wrote of Ezra Pound, "and is naturally a little provincial about it." It is a good joke, and will bear some analysis. How could Pound, an American who was interested in the old and new literatures of Europe as well as those of ancient China and more recent Japan, be provincial? If Pound was provincial, who wasn't? The implied answer, of course, lies in the approach. Pound wasn't provincial about the works he chose to read, only about the way he chose to read them. Something of the same suspicion of provinciality attaches itself, for many of us, to the idea of world literature. We fall in love, in David Damrosch's phrase, "with a body of work from another time and place" (158), and we keep falling in love with different works and bodies of work. We love the literature of the world (love much of what we have managed to read of it, in its first language or in translation), but we are not sure world literature is

Journal

Comparative Literature StudiesPenn State University Press

Published: Mar 4, 2004

There are no references for this article.