Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Review of Michael W. Doyle’s Striking First

Review of Michael W. Doyle’s Striking First Democratic Professionalism: Sharing Authority First Review of Michael W. Doyle's Striking in Civic Life Albert W. Dzur Rabih Helou doctrinal differences, Doyle's recommendations surprisingly end Preemptive war existed long before the Bush doctrine and up looking very much like a doctrine that tolerates unilateral and the "War on Terror." The notion of jus ad bellum, or just war, subjective evaluation of terms allowing preventive strikes. Doyle allows under international convention the right to strike when states that the criteria of prevention list a priori the exceptions an opponent is verging on an attack so overwhelming and immipermitting unilateral action by states or multilateral action withnent that no time is left for deliberation. If this principle is not out Security Council sanction. It is this openness to exceptions new, what has motivated the controversy surrounding the Bush that weakens the basis of the guidelines he intends to promote. doctrine of preemption? Michael W. Doyle, renowned scholar of Doyle begins his argument by outlining why current customary international relations and international law, and former assistant international law surrounding preemption is insufficient. Present secretary-general of the United Nations, sheds light on the debate day conventions are traced back to an 1837 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Good Society Penn State University Press

Review of Michael W. Doyle’s Striking First

The Good Society , Volume 18 (1) – Aug 21, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/review-of-michael-w-doyle-s-striking-first-YPY4eGKBWe

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Penn State University Press
ISSN
1538-9731
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Democratic Professionalism: Sharing Authority First Review of Michael W. Doyle's Striking in Civic Life Albert W. Dzur Rabih Helou doctrinal differences, Doyle's recommendations surprisingly end Preemptive war existed long before the Bush doctrine and up looking very much like a doctrine that tolerates unilateral and the "War on Terror." The notion of jus ad bellum, or just war, subjective evaluation of terms allowing preventive strikes. Doyle allows under international convention the right to strike when states that the criteria of prevention list a priori the exceptions an opponent is verging on an attack so overwhelming and immipermitting unilateral action by states or multilateral action withnent that no time is left for deliberation. If this principle is not out Security Council sanction. It is this openness to exceptions new, what has motivated the controversy surrounding the Bush that weakens the basis of the guidelines he intends to promote. doctrine of preemption? Michael W. Doyle, renowned scholar of Doyle begins his argument by outlining why current customary international relations and international law, and former assistant international law surrounding preemption is insufficient. Present secretary-general of the United Nations, sheds light on the debate day conventions are traced back to an 1837

Journal

The Good SocietyPenn State University Press

Published: Aug 21, 2009

There are no references for this article.