Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Postmodernism, Autonomy and Bioethical Boundaries

Postmodernism, Autonomy and Bioethical Boundaries Democratic Professionalism: Sharing Authority in Civic Life Postmodernism, Autonomy and Bioethical Boundaries Charles W. Rubin Albert T. Dzur A funny thing happened when President Obama announced are not, qua experts, necessarily at all interested in consensus; the dissolution of the President's Council on Bioethics. For much they are interested in being right, or perhaps in knowing of its existence the council had been (mis)characterized as little something true. Consensus in and of itself is no measure of more than the bioethics appendage of a vast right wing contruth. On the other hand, building consensus from which to make spiracy, a place where reason confronted religion and reason lost. policy is one way of understanding what politics and regulation At the end, it transformed into something much closer to what it are all about. If that is true, why do we need a bioethics council really was. The New York Times story by Nicholas Wade formed at all, so long as there are legislative and regulatory processes in the basis for much subsequent commentary about the President's place? The Cherlin/Charo model seems to ask of experts what action. Wade quoted Reid Cherlin, a White House press officer, they may http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Good Society Penn State University Press

Postmodernism, Autonomy and Bioethical Boundaries

The Good Society , Volume 19 (1) – Jul 22, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/postmodernism-autonomy-and-bioethical-boundaries-1m0E0c11xU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Penn State University Press
ISSN
1538-9731
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Democratic Professionalism: Sharing Authority in Civic Life Postmodernism, Autonomy and Bioethical Boundaries Charles W. Rubin Albert T. Dzur A funny thing happened when President Obama announced are not, qua experts, necessarily at all interested in consensus; the dissolution of the President's Council on Bioethics. For much they are interested in being right, or perhaps in knowing of its existence the council had been (mis)characterized as little something true. Consensus in and of itself is no measure of more than the bioethics appendage of a vast right wing contruth. On the other hand, building consensus from which to make spiracy, a place where reason confronted religion and reason lost. policy is one way of understanding what politics and regulation At the end, it transformed into something much closer to what it are all about. If that is true, why do we need a bioethics council really was. The New York Times story by Nicholas Wade formed at all, so long as there are legislative and regulatory processes in the basis for much subsequent commentary about the President's place? The Cherlin/Charo model seems to ask of experts what action. Wade quoted Reid Cherlin, a White House press officer, they may

Journal

The Good SocietyPenn State University Press

Published: Jul 22, 2010

There are no references for this article.