Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2001)
Estimating false discovery rates under dependence , with applications to DNA microarrays , Technical Report 200128
John Storey, Jonathan Taylor, D. Siegmund (2004)
Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approachJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 66
John Storey, R. Tibshirani (2003)
Statistical significance for genomewide studiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100
B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, John Storey, V. Tusher (2001)
Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray ExperimentJournal of the American Statistical Association, 96
Todd Golub, Todd Golub, D. Slonim, Pablo Tamayo, Christine Huard, Michelle Gaasenbeek, J. Mesirov, Hilary Coller, M. Loh, James Downing, Michael Caligiuri, C. Bloomfield, Eric Lander (1999)
Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.Science, 286 5439
B. Efron (2001)
Microarrays empirical Bayes methods, and false discovery rates
John Storey (2002)
A direct approach to false discovery ratesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64
B. Efron (2004)
Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis TestingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 99
S. Dudoit, J. Shaffer, Jennifer Boldrick (2003)
Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Microarray ExperimentsStatistical Science, 18
B. Efron, R. Tibshirani (2002)
Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarraysGenetic Epidemiology, 23
C. Genovese, L. Wasserman (2001)
Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the FDR Procedure
Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg (1995)
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 57
C. Genovese, L. Wasserman (2003)
A Stochastic Process Approach to False Discovery Rates
(2001)
Significance analysis of microarrays applied to transcriptional responses to ionizing radiation
Multiple testing issues are important in gene expression studies, where typically thousands of genes are compared over two or more experimental conditions. The false discovery rate has become a popular measure in this setting. Here we discuss a complementary measure, the ‘miss rate’, and show how to estimate it in practice.
Biostatistics – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.