Subscribe to thousands of academic journals for just $40/month
Read and share the articles you need for your research, all in one place.

The Concluding Observations of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies

Human Rights Law Review , Volume 6 (1) – Jan 1, 2006


Oxford University Press
Copyright © 2006 Oxford University Press
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Preview Only

Expand Tray Hide Tray

The Concluding Observations of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies


The seven principal United Nations-sponsored human rights treaties stipulate that States Parties submit periodic reports to the respective treaty monitoring bodies (or ‘committees’)1 on the implementation of their treaty obligations. Following the review of a report, the treaty body in question issues a set of ‘concluding observations’, containing its collective assessment of the State's record and recommendations for enhanced implementation of the rights in question. Arguably, the issuance of concluding observations is the single most important activity of human rights treaty bodies. It provides an opportunity for the delivery of an authoritative overview of the state of human rights in a country and for the delivery of forms of advice which can stimulate systemic improvements. Its significance is all the greater now that the only accounts of the review of periodic reports which appear in the annual reports of the treaty bodies are the adopted concluding observations.2 This article seeks to test key aspects of the quality of concluding observations. The analysis is set within the framework of review of the development of the practice.
Loading next page...

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.