Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sitting on Powder Kegs: Socioeconomic Rights in Transitional Societies

Sitting on Powder Kegs: Socioeconomic Rights in Transitional Societies Considerable progress has been made in the field of transitional justice in recent years, signified by such landmarks as a permanent international criminal court. Unaddressed aspects of transition remain, however, which need serious attention if peace is to be sustainable in the long term. Oppressive political arrangements favor particular segments of society while simultaneously disenfranchising and economically and socially excluding the less powerful. To date, transitional justice initiatives have focused on the cessation of violence, establishing order and correcting civil and political injustices. Social and economic factors have taken second or no place at all. Yet, social and economic grievances can be powder kegs that, if left unaddressed, threaten to blow up peace initiatives. Zimbabwe provides empirical evidence of the dangers of marginalizing economic and social imperatives in the transition from repression. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Transitional Justice Oxford University Press

Sitting on Powder Kegs: Socioeconomic Rights in Transitional Societies

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/sitting-on-powder-kegs-socioeconomic-rights-in-transitional-societies-n3SlNGeHV0

References (33)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Subject
Article
ISSN
1752-7716
eISSN
1752-7724
DOI
10.1093/ijtj/ijp010
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in the field of transitional justice in recent years, signified by such landmarks as a permanent international criminal court. Unaddressed aspects of transition remain, however, which need serious attention if peace is to be sustainable in the long term. Oppressive political arrangements favor particular segments of society while simultaneously disenfranchising and economically and socially excluding the less powerful. To date, transitional justice initiatives have focused on the cessation of violence, establishing order and correcting civil and political injustices. Social and economic factors have taken second or no place at all. Yet, social and economic grievances can be powder kegs that, if left unaddressed, threaten to blow up peace initiatives. Zimbabwe provides empirical evidence of the dangers of marginalizing economic and social imperatives in the transition from repression.

Journal

International Journal of Transitional JusticeOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.