Possible explanation of the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo measurements of Rubisco activity: a study in loblolly pine grown in elevated pCO2
Abstract
Abstract Rubisco activity can be measured using gas exchange ( in vivo ) or using in vitro methods. Commonly in vitro methods yield activities that are less than those obtained in vivo . Rubisco activity was measured both in vivo and in vitro using a spectrophotometric technique in mature Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) trees grown using free‐air CO 2 enrichment in elevated (56 Pa) and current (36 Pa) p CO 2 . In addition, for studies where both in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity were reported net CO 2 uptake rate ( A ) was modelled based on the in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity reported in the literature. Both the modelling exercise and the experimental data showed that the in vitro values of Rubisco activity were insufficient to account for the observed values of A . A trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation of the protein from samples taken in parallel with those used for activity analysis was co‐electrophoresed with the extract used for determining in vitro Rubisco activity. There was significantly more Rubisco present in the TCA precipitated samples, suggesting that the underestimation of Rubisco activity in vitro was attributable to an insufficient extraction of Rubisco protein prior to activity analysis. Correction of in vitro values to account for the under‐represented Rubisco yielded mechanistically valid values for Rubisco activity. However, despite the low absolute values for Rubisco activity determined in vitro , the trends reported with CO 2 treatment concurred with, and were of equal magnitude to, those observed in Rubisco activity measured in vivo . Key words