Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Holsztynski, W. Koczkodaj (1996)
Convergence of Inconsistency Algorithms for the Pairwise ComparisonsInf. Process. Lett., 59
L. Mikhailov (2000)
A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy processJournal of the Operational Research Society, 51
(2006)
Generalized Consistency and Representation of Preferences by Pairwise Comparisons in “Panamerican Conference of Applied Mathematics,
J. González-Pachón, C. Romero (2004)
A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisonsEur. J. Oper. Res., 158
Tijen Ertay, C. Kahraman (2007)
Evaluation of design requirements using fuzzy outranking methods: Research ArticlesJournal of intelligent systems, 22
R. Haller, R. Szwarc (2005)
Kaczmarz algorithm in Hilbert spaceStudia Mathematica, 169
M. Brunelli, M. Fedrizzi (2007)
Fair Consistency Evaluation in Fuzzy Preference Relations and in AHP
Y. Yavin (1993)
Suboptimal nonlinear filtering of the rate of an observed point processMathematical and Computer Modelling, 18
Peter Bullions (1983)
The Principles of English Grammar
(1980)
The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill
R. Luce, J. Tukey (1964)
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurementJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1
(1931)
Measurement Erkenntnis
M. Kwiesielewicz, E. Uden (2004)
Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHPComput. Oper. Res., 31
S. Stevens, H. Meyerhoff, W. Davis, I. Bacto-Agar (1946)
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.Science, 103 2684
M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi, R. Pereira (2002)
On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation
S. Bozóki (2003)
A method for solving LSM problems of small size in the AHP
L. Thurstone (1994)
A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 34
R. Jensen (1984)
An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 28
P. Jong (1984)
A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for prioritiesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 28
(1983)
Comparison of eigenvector, least squares, chi squares and logarithmic least squares methods of scaling a reciprocal matrix
M. Anholcer, V. Babiy, S. Bozóki, W. Koczkodaj (2011)
A simplified implementation of the least squares solution for pairwise comparisons matricesCentral European Journal of Operations Research, 19
A. Farkas, P. Lancaster, P. Rózsa (2003)
Consistency adjustments for pairwise comparison matricesNumerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 10
W. Koczkodaj, Michael Herman, M. Orlowski (1997)
Using consistency-driven pairwise comparisons in knowledge-based systems
E. Choo, W. Wedley (2004)
A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matricesComput. Oper. Res., 31
T. Saaty (1977)
A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical StructuresJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 15
(1937)
Angenäherte Auflösung von Systemen linearer Gleichungen
(1283)
Artifitium electionis personarum
J. Fülöp (2008)
A method for approximating pairwise comparison matrices by consistent matricesJournal of Global Optimization, 42
R. Luce, Ward Edwards, J. Adams, E. Boring, L. Christie, E. Galanter, A. Hastorf, C. Kluckhohn, W. Mcgill, F. Mosteller, S. Stevens (1958)
The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences.Psychological review, 65 4
A. Chu, R. Kalaba, K. Spingarn (1979)
A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy setsJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27
B. Golany, M. Kress (1993)
A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matricesEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 69
B. Cavallo, L. D'Apuzzo (2009)
A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methodsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24
J. Barzilai (1997)
Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matricesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 48
Heinz Bauschke, J. Borwein (1996)
On Projection Algorithms for Solving Convex Feasibility ProblemsSIAM Rev., 38
(2007)
How to measure anything
E. Blankmeyer (1987)
Approaches to consistency adjustmentJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 54
F. Limayem, B. Yannou (2007)
Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision ratingComput. Oper. Res., 34
English translation : Approximate solution of systems of linear equations
T. Saaty (2003)
Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessaryEur. J. Oper. Res., 145
G. Crawford, Cindy Williams (1985)
A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matricesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 29
(2008)
Advanced method in Inconsistency Knowledge Management
S. Bozóki (2008)
Solution of the least squares method problem of pairwise comparison matricesCentral European Journal of Operations Research, 16
Nicolas Condorcet (2009)
Essai Sur L'Application de L'Analyse a la Probabilite Des Decisions Rendues a la Pluralite Des Voix
M. Fedrizzi, S. Giove (2007)
Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimizationEur. J. Oper. Res., 183
S. Flåm, J. Zowe (1990)
Relaxed outer projections, weighted averages and convex feasibilityBIT, 30
S. Bozóki, T. Rapcsák (2008)
On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matricesJournal of Global Optimization, 42
L. D'Apuzzo, G. Marcarelli, M. Squillante (2007)
Generalized consistency and intensity vectors for comparison matricesInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22
C. Costa, Jean-Claude Vansnick (2008)
A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHPEur. J. Oper. Res., 187
Ming-Shin Kuo, G. Liang, Wen-Chih Huang (2006)
Extensions of the multicriteria analysis with pairwise comparison under a fuzzy environmentInt. J. Approx. Reason., 43
Michael Herman, W. Koczkodaj (1996)
A Monte Carlo Study of Parwise ComparisonInf. Process. Lett., 57
W. Koczkodaj, M. Orlowski (1999)
Computing a consistent approximation to a generalized pairwise comparisons matrixComputers & Mathematics With Applications, 37
W. Koczkodaj (1993)
A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisonsMathematical and Computer Modelling, 18
G. Debreu (1959)
Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory
A complete proof of convergence of a certain class of reduction algorithms for distance-based inconsistency (defined in 1993) for pairwise comparisons is presented in this paper. Using pairwise comparisons is a powerful method for synthesizing measurements and subjective assessments. From the mathematical point of view, the pairwise comparisons method generates a matrix (say A) of ratio values (aij) of the ith entity compared with the jth entity according to a given criterion. Entities/criteria can be both quantitative or qualitative allowing this method to deal with complex decisions. However, subjective assessments often involve inconsistency, which is usually undesirable. The assessment can be refined via analysis of inconsistency, leading to reduction of the latter.The proposed method of localizing the inconsistency may conceivably be of relevance for nonclassical logics (e.g., paraconsistent logic) and for uncertainty reasoning since it accommodates inconsistency by treating inconsistent data as still useful information.
Logic Journal of the IGPL – Oxford University Press
Published: Dec 16, 2010
Keywords: algorithm convergence pairwise comparisons inconsistency
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.