Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Responses to Critics

Responses to Critics In this paper I respond to the criticisms of Helen Longino, Alan Richardson, Naomi Oreskes and Sharyn Clough. There is discussion of the character of social knowledge, the goals of scientific inquiry, the connections between Social Empiricism and other approaches in science studies, productive and unproductive dissent, and the distinction between empirical and nonempirical decision vectors. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Perspectives on Science MIT Press

Responses to Critics

Perspectives on Science , Volume 16 (3) – Oct 1, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/mit-press/responses-to-critics-wtmqfR0YKW

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
MIT Press
Copyright
© 2008 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
ISSN
1063-6145
eISSN
1530-9274
DOI
10.1162/posc.2008.16.3.280
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this paper I respond to the criticisms of Helen Longino, Alan Richardson, Naomi Oreskes and Sharyn Clough. There is discussion of the character of social knowledge, the goals of scientific inquiry, the connections between Social Empiricism and other approaches in science studies, productive and unproductive dissent, and the distinction between empirical and nonempirical decision vectors.

Journal

Perspectives on ScienceMIT Press

Published: Oct 1, 2008

There are no references for this article.