Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Hopf, S. Luck, M. Girelli, T. Hagner, G. Mangun, Henning Scheich, Hans-Jochen Heinze (2000)
Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.Cerebral cortex, 10 12
G. Woodman, S. Luck (1999)
Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual searchNature, 400
G. Berlucchi (2006)
Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better nameCognitive Neuropsychology, 23
Robert Cox, James Hyde (1997)
Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI dataNMR in Biomedicine, 10
P. Reuter-Lorenz, A. Jha, James Rosenquist (1996)
What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 22 2
(1997)
Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and 732
J. McDonald, W. Teder-Sälejärvi, F. Russo, S. Hillyard (2005)
Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perceptionNature Neuroscience, 8
Tracy Taylor, R. Klein (2000)
Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 26 5
Hermann Müller, A. Mühlenen (2000)
Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of return.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 26 5
S. Luck, S. Hillyard (1994)
Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 20 5
S. Luck, Michelle Ford (1998)
On the role of selective attention in visual perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95 3
M. Posner, R. Rafal, Lisa Choate, J. Vaughan (1985)
Inhibition of return : Neural basis and functionCognitive Neuropsychology, 2
J. Najemnik, W. Geisler (2005)
Optimal eye movement strategies in visual searchNature, 434
G. Galfano, M. Sarlo, Federica Sassi, M. Munafò, Luis, J. Fuentes, C. Umilta, L. Fuentes
Please Scroll down for Article Social Neuroscience Reorienting of Spatial Attention in Gaze Cuing Is Reflected in N2pc Reorienting of Spatial Attention in Gaze Cuing Is Reflected in N2pc
David Prime, P. Jolicoeur (2010)
Mental Rotation Requires Visual Short-term Memory: Evidence from Human Electric Cortical ActivityJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22
E. Wascher, S. Tipper (2004)
Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: an EEG study of inhibition of return.Psychophysiology, 41 5
R. Klein, Jason Ivanoff (2000)
Inhibition of returnTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 4
J. Pratt, Thomas Spalek, F. Bradshaw (2004)
The Time to Detect Targets at Inhibited and Noninhibited Locations : Preliminary Evidence for Attentional Momentum
S. Luck, M. Girelli, Michele McDermott, Michelle Ford (1997)
Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective AttentionCognitive Psychology, 33
David Prime, L. Ward (2006)
Cortical expressions of inhibition of returnBrain Research, 1072
J. Gross, J. Kujala, M. Hämäläinen, L. Timmermann, A. Schnitzler, R. Salmelin (2001)
Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98 2
J. McDonald, L. Ward, K. Kiehl (1999)
An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of returnPerception & Psychophysics, 61
S. Baijal, N. Srinivasan (2011)
Emotional and hemispheric asymmetries in shifts of attention: An ERP studyCognition and Emotion, 25
E. Maylor, R. Hockey (1985)
Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 11 6
R. Klein, Joseph MacInnes (1999)
Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual SearchPsychological Science, 10
T. Handy, A. Jha, G. Mangun (1999)
Promoting Novelty in Vision: Inhibition of Return Modulates Perceptual-Level ProcessingPsychological Science, 10
R. Klein (1988)
Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual searchNature, 334
E. Maylor, R. Hockey (1987)
Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual spaceNeuropsychologia, 25
A. Kiesel, Jeff Miller, P. Jolicoeur, Benoit Brisson (2008)
Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods.Psychophysiology, 45 2
David Prime, Patrik Pluchino, M. Eimer, Roberto Dell'Acqua, P. Jolicœur (2011)
Object-substitution masking modulates spatial attention deployment and the encoding of information in visual short-term memory: insights from occipito-parietal ERP components.Psychophysiology, 48 5
J. Moake, Aubrey Bernardo, K. Fujikawa, Chalmette Ball, L. Nolasco, M. Cruz, S. Vesely, J. George, B. Lämmle, D. Studt, L. Alberio, G. Raskob (2003)
This article has been cited by other articles
B. Veen, W. Drongelen, M. Yuchtman, A. Suzuki (1997)
Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filteringIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44
Giancarlo Tassinari, Giovanni Berlucchi (1993)
Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primesVision Research, 33
G. Houghton, S. Tipper (1994)
A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention.
M. Posner, Yoav Cohen (1984)
Components of visual orientingAttention and Performance, 10
C. Hickey, J. McDonald, J. Theeuwes (2013)
Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual AttentionJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 39 3
Bernhard Pastötter, S. Hanslmayr, K. Bäuml (2008)
Inhibition of Return Arises from Inhibition of Response Processes: An Analysis of Oscillatory Beta ActivityJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20
David Prime, L. Ward (2004)
Inhibition of Return From Stimulus to ResponsePsychological Science, 15
Thomas Spalek, V. Lollo (2007)
The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IORPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14
People are slow to react to objects that appear at recently attended locations. This delay—known as inhibition of return (IOR)—is believed to aid search of the visual environment by discouraging inspection of recently inspected objects. However, after two decades of research, there is no evidence that IOR reflects an inhibition in the covert deployment of attention. Here, observers participated in a modified visual-search task that enabled us to measure IOR and an ERP component called the posterior contralateral N2 (N2pc) that reflects the covert deployment of attention. The N2pc was smaller when a target appeared at a recently attended location than when it appeared at a recently unattended location. This reduction was due to modulation of neural processing in the visual cortex and the right parietal lobe. Importantly, there was no evidence for a delay in the N2pc. We conclude that in our task, the inhibitory processes underlying IOR reduce the probability of shifting attention to recently attended locations but do not delay the covert deployment of attention itself.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience – MIT Press
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.