Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Habits and the Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice

Habits and the Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice This paper analyzes a model of discounted utility under habit formation. Habit formation means that utility in each period is determined by the difference between the received outcome and the customary outcome at that point in time. Preferences are rational, in the sense that the decision maker correctly anticipates the habit formation process and behaves in a dynamically consistent manner, i.e., plans are truly carried out. The purpose is to demonstrate that this generalization of the discounted utility model accounts, jointly and in a meaningful way, for the most striking anomalies with respect to classical discounted utility theory. The common difference effect is explained first. This effect, also called decreasing impatience effect, has usually been viewed as evidence against exponential discounting. Then, the frequently observed preference for increasing sequences of outcomes is examined. Such preference, under the traditional discounted utility model, would be regarded as a paradoxical case of negative discounting. A discussion of the descriptive, prescriptive, and normative values of the model is included. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Management Science INFORMS

Habits and the Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice

Wathieu, Luc
Management Science , Volume 43 (11): 12 – Nov 1, 1997
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/informs/habits-and-the-anomalies-in-intertemporal-choice-JjtyHThcHD

References (33)

Publisher
INFORMS
Copyright
Copyright © INFORMS
Subject
Research Article
ISSN
0025-1909
eISSN
1526-5501
DOI
10.1287/mnsc.43.11.1552
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper analyzes a model of discounted utility under habit formation. Habit formation means that utility in each period is determined by the difference between the received outcome and the customary outcome at that point in time. Preferences are rational, in the sense that the decision maker correctly anticipates the habit formation process and behaves in a dynamically consistent manner, i.e., plans are truly carried out. The purpose is to demonstrate that this generalization of the discounted utility model accounts, jointly and in a meaningful way, for the most striking anomalies with respect to classical discounted utility theory. The common difference effect is explained first. This effect, also called decreasing impatience effect, has usually been viewed as evidence against exponential discounting. Then, the frequently observed preference for increasing sequences of outcomes is examined. Such preference, under the traditional discounted utility model, would be regarded as a paradoxical case of negative discounting. A discussion of the descriptive, prescriptive, and normative values of the model is included.

Journal

Management Science – INFORMS

Published: Nov 1, 1997

Keywords: Keywords : intertemporal choice ; habit formation ; discounted utility ; decreasing impatience ; negative time preference ; dynamic consistency

There are no references for this article.