Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Green, J. Carroll, S. Goldberg (1981)
A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 45
L. Rabiner (1984)
Combinatorial optimization:Algorithms and complexityIEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 32
J. Kruskal (1965)
Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the DataJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 27
S. Albers, K. Brockhoff (1977)
A procedure for new product positioning in an attribute spaceEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1
B. Gavish, D. Horsky, K. Srikanth (1983)
An Approach to the Optimal Positioning of a New ProductManagement Science, 29
P. Green, V. Rao (1971)
Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental DataJournal of Marketing Research, 8
P. Green, V. Srinivasan (1978)
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and OutlookJournal of Consumer Research, 5
Richard Johnson (1974)
Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer ValuesJournal of Marketing Research, 11
J. Hauser, P. Simmie (1981)
Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory for the Selection of Product Features and PriceManagement Science, 27
V. Srinivasan, Allan Shocker (1973)
Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgmentsPsychometrika, 38
S. Addelman (1978)
Statistics for experimenters
P. Green (1984)
Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository ReviewJournal of Marketing Research, 21
S. Albers (1979)
An extended algorithm for optimal product positioningEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 3
A dynamic-programming heuristic is described to find approximate solutions to the problem of identifying a new, multi-attribute product profile associated with the highest share-of-choices in a competitive market. The input data consist of idiosyncratic multi-attribute preference functions estimated using conjoint or hybrid-conjoint analysis. An individual is assumed to choose a new product profile if he/she associates a higher utility with it than with a status-quo alternative. Importance weights are assigned to individuals to account for differences in their purchase and/or usage rates and the performance of a new product profile is evaluated after taking into account its cannibalization of a seller's existing brands. In a simulation with real-sized problems, the proposed heuristic strictly dominates an alternative lagrangian-relaxation heuristic in terms of both computational time and approximation of the optimal solution. Across 192 simulated problems, the dynamic-programming heuristic identifies product profiles whose share-of-choices, on average, are 98.2% of the share-of-choices of the optimal product profile, suggesting that it closely approximates the optimal solution.
Management Science – INFORMS
Published: Dec 1, 1987
Keywords: Keywords : marketing ; product design ; conjoint analysis ; heuristics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.