Subscribe to thousands of academic journals for just $40/month
Read and share the articles you need for your research, all in one place.

The Relative Importance of Suboperations of Prospective Memory

Applied Neuropsychology , Volume 15 (3): 184-193 – Jul 1, 2008


Psychology Press
© 2008 Informa plc
activities of daily living
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Preview Only

Expand Tray Hide Tray

The Relative Importance of Suboperations of Prospective Memory


An event-based and a time-based prospective memory (PM) task, a script generation task, several working memory tasks, an incidental retrospective memory task, and a screen clock were implemented on the computer in one integrated procedure lasting between one and two hours. The procedure was designed to simulate four working days and four nights for a white-collar employee. Sixty-eight normal participants completed the task. Time-based prospective memory (self-injecting and going to bed at preordained times of day) shared unique variance with clock checking, but hardly at all with incidental retrospective memory. On the other hand, event-based prospective memory (answering a faint telephone cue as quickly as possible) shared unique variance with incidental retrospective memory of formally task irrelevant context and less with clock checking. The latter correlational dissociation of event-based versus time-based PM by retrospective memory reached significance, inspiring the idea that administrative versus clerical work might each impose its own type of PM demands. In both types of PM, low-level abilities (use of external aids and incidental encoding of context, respectively) seem to be critical for good performance, more so than for high-order executive functions. Our software is offered to the readership to explicitate these findings further or for other research pursuits.
Loading next page...

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.