Subscribe to thousands of academic journals for just $40/month
Read and share the articles you need for your research, all in one place.

Rights

Australasian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 86 (4): 685-687 – Dec 1, 2008

Details

Publisher
Routledge
Copyright
© 2008 Informa plc
ISSN
0004-8402
D.O.I.
10.1080/00048400802421814
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Preview Only

Expand Tray Hide Tray

Rights

Abstract

Rights Ivison, Duncan, Rights , Stocksfield: Acumen, 2008, pp. xiii + 288, 14.99 (paper). The book presents contemporary normative political theories proposed by Rawls, Habermas and many others, and provides illuminating discussions of them. A number of chapters cover earlier writers, among them Locke, Kant and Hegel. It is rich in content, as even the bibliography suggests: it lists about 250 books and 200 other writings. Externalities first. Many of the 223 endnotes are substantive. Finding them wastes readers' time because of the scandalous and inexcusable absence of cross-references in the running-heads. Otherwise, the editing is not too bad, but there are flaws, especially in the last chapter. Textual lapses, the detection of which is what friends are for (why did none of them spot 'under his sui iuris '?), makes one wonder whether the gratitude to all thirty-five persons acknowledged by the author is fully deserved. Ivison calls his approach naturalistic, in the sense that 'rights are best understood as a social practice '. The practice is said to consist in 'claiming and recognizing rights' [18f]. Leaving aside the apparent circularity, describing rights as a 'social practice' sounds like a category mistake. A practice, like voting, is
Loading next page...

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.

 
/lp/informa-healthcare/rights-PSbs7fYWxA