In a recent discussion paper on an improved conceptual framework (IASB, 2006a), the IASB and the FASB argue that prudence and conservatism are not desirable qualities of financial reporting information (IASB, 2006a, BC2.22). One interpretation of this proposal is that the consistent undervaluation of net assets (consistent conservatism), which used to be common under Continental European GAAPs and to some extent under US GAAP, is not considered to be an adequate way of dealing with uncertainty. Instead, the changes in the business conditions of a firm should be, to a greater extent, reflected in the financial reporting via changes in future-oriented estimates and probabilities. In turn, this should increase the decision relevance to users. However, although the boards suggest that the improved framework will not include prudence or conservatism as desirable qualities, this paper suggests that a more valid description is that consistently conservative accounting treatments will be replaced by accounting methods that leave more opportunities for temporary conservatism (changes in accounting estimates that temporarily understate net assets via the creation of hidden reserves which later may be reversed). From a user perspective, temporary conservatism is demanding because of the increased income-shifting between periods. This is illustrated in the paper by examining three cases concerning loss carryforwards, development costs and construction contracts, related to three different standards (IAS 12, IAS 38 and IAS 11, respectively). Furthermore, the paper illustrates how the mixing of consistent and temporary conservatism may lead to counter-intuitive interpretations of the underlying business activities that, in turn, make the information less relevant to users.
Accounting Conservatism under IFRS
Abstract
In a recent discussion paper on an improved conceptual framework (IASB, 2006a), the IASB and the FASB argue that prudence and conservatism are not desirable qualities of financial reporting information (IASB, 2006a, BC2.22). One interpretation of this proposal is that the consistent undervaluation of net assets (consistent conservatism), which used to be common under Continental European GAAPs and to some extent under US GAAP, is not considered to be an adequate way of dealing with uncertainty. Instead, the changes in the business conditions of a firm should be, to a greater extent, reflected in the financial reporting via changes in future-oriented estimates and probabilities. In turn, this should increase the decision relevance to users. However, although the boards suggest that the improved framework will not include prudence or conservatism as desirable qualities, this paper suggests that a more valid description is that consistently conservative accounting treatments will be replaced by accounting methods that leave more opportunities for temporary conservatism (changes in accounting estimates that temporarily understate net assets via the creation of hidden reserves which later may be reversed). From a user perspective, temporary conservatism is demanding because of the increased income-shifting between periods. This is illustrated in the paper by examining three cases concerning loss carryforwards, development costs and construction contracts, related to three different standards (IAS 12, IAS 38 and IAS 11, respectively). Furthermore, the paper illustrates how the mixing of consistent and temporary conservatism may lead to counter-intuitive interpretations of the underlying business activities that, in turn, make the information less relevant to users.Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.
/lp/informa-healthcare/accounting-conservatism-under-ifrs-jAJtx9dVhC
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Preview Only
Accounting Conservatism under IFRS
Follow Accounting in Europe
, Volume 5 (2): 71-100
Informa Healthcare – Dec 1, 2008
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
