Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Role of Justice in Hume's Theory of Psychological Development

The Role of Justice in Hume's Theory of Psychological Development Abstract: Hume's theory of justice, intricately linked to his account of moral development, is at once simplistic and mysterious, combining familiar conventionalist elements with perplexing, complicated elements of his rich moral psychology. These dimensions of his theory make interpreting it no easy task, although many have tried. Emerging from these many different attempts is a picture of Hume as defending an account of justice according to which justice consists of expedient rules designed to advance one's self-interest. The mistake of this view, I argue, lies in its narrow focus on the material rather than psychological effects of the conventions of justice. My goal here is to isolate the psychological effects of the rules of justice by analyzing the psychological transformation of the parties who morally commit to justice. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Hume Studies Hume Society

The Role of Justice in Hume's Theory of Psychological Development

Hume Studies , Volume 32 (2) – Jan 26, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/hume-society/the-role-of-justice-in-hume-s-theory-of-psychological-development-AQselaco1W

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Hume Society
Copyright
Copyright © Hume Society
ISSN
1947-9921
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: Hume's theory of justice, intricately linked to his account of moral development, is at once simplistic and mysterious, combining familiar conventionalist elements with perplexing, complicated elements of his rich moral psychology. These dimensions of his theory make interpreting it no easy task, although many have tried. Emerging from these many different attempts is a picture of Hume as defending an account of justice according to which justice consists of expedient rules designed to advance one's self-interest. The mistake of this view, I argue, lies in its narrow focus on the material rather than psychological effects of the conventions of justice. My goal here is to isolate the psychological effects of the rules of justice by analyzing the psychological transformation of the parties who morally commit to justice.

Journal

Hume StudiesHume Society

Published: Jan 26, 2006

There are no references for this article.