<h2>THE COKE IN COCA-COLA</h2> If our economy tanked because of subprime mortgages, perhaps the time has come to look at subprime drugs. (I’d call drugs “subprime” if they affect bodily functions without having undergone tests of safety and efficacy by the FDA.) Unfortunately, the $24 billion/year “dietary supplement” industry peddles subprime concoctions that can only be recalled after someone blows a whistle. Case in point: A highly publicized lawsuit filed by the Falcons’ Grady Jackson preceded a manufacturer’s recall of StarCaps slimming capsules and manufacturer recalls of more than 60 other dietary supplements. Among the covert ingredients of these over-the-counter nostrums was bumetanide, a potent diuretic (5) ⇓ . This was not the first time a court in Atlanta has heard accusations of hidden ingredients in a patent medicinal. In 1902, an Atlanta courtroom heard evidence that a medicinal “stimulant,” Coca-Cola, was liberally laced with caffeine and undetermined amounts of cocaine. The ensuing uproar over secret components, especially cocaine, in patent medicines led to passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, provisions of which still guide the FDA. Follow-up litigation ensured that today’s Coke no longer contains coke (6) ⇓ . The 1902 trial in
/lp/fed-of-american-socs-for-experimental-biology/the-atlanta-falcon-and-tono-bungay-dietary-supplements-as-subprime-6pMYQjJCZY