Journals instruct authors to proofread their accepted manuscripts before signing them off for publication and expect them to submit errata to correct any mistakes identified thereafter. Herein, I examine papers with obvious errors in the author name list. I queried PubMed for papers under common Greek forenames looking for citations where author surnames and forenames are swapped. I identified 113 such papers from 101 journals. Author names are corrected with errata only in 20, after a median of 6.5 mo. Time to name correction is shorter for journals with impact factor above the median ( P =0.015). To further explore this suggested association of apparent author sloppiness with journal impact, I use as controls all errata published between 1996 and 2008 in 5 top-cited general medical journals ( New England Journal of Medicine , JAMA , The Lancet , Annals of Internal Medicine , and British Medical Journal ); 3.4% of the latter contain name corrections ( vs. 18.1% of all errata in the 101 journals during the same period, P <10 −6 ). Egregious errors may be markers of cursory if any proofreading and, therefore, markers for additional unidentified inaccuracies. In addition, I wonder whether authors may be as reluctant to rectify other, nonobvious (yet potentially consequential) mistakes after a paper’s publication. —Trikalinos, T. A. Does it mean anything if your own name is wrong in your published paper?
/lp/fed-of-american-socs-for-experimental-biology/does-it-mean-anything-if-your-own-name-is-wrong-in-your-published-gt0qq88PNm