Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Frías-Martínez, Sherry Chen, Xiaohui Liu (2007)
Automatic cognitive style identification of digital library users for personalizationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58
B. Cesnik (2001)
Digital LibrariesYearbook of Medical Informatics, 10
Jack Maness (2006)
Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for LibrariesWebology, 3
Ying Ding, G. Chowdhury, S. Foo (2004)
Journal as Markers of Intellectual Space: Journal Co-Citation Analysis of Information Retrieval Area, 1987–1997Scientometrics, 47
Pride Shoniwa, Hazel Hall (2007)
LIBRARY 2.0 AND UK ACADEMIC LIBRARIES: DRIVERS AND IMPACTSNew Review of Information Networking, 13
(2006)
Library 2.0 and ‘library 2.0’
R. Lankes, Joanne Silverstein, Scott Nicholson, T. Marshall (2007)
Participatory networks: the library as conversationInf. Res., 12
Qin He (1999)
Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word AnalysisLibr. Trends, 48
Tim O'Reilly (2007)
What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of SoftwareeBusiness & eCommerce
M. Tsay, Hong Xu, Chia-wen Wu (2003)
Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literatureScientometrics, 57
(2008)
Nice take on web 2.0 expo from information
H. Small, E. Garfield (1985)
The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappingsJournal of Information Science, 11
(2007)
Web 2.0 - johdatus internetin uusiin liiketoimintamahdollisuuksiin, Tieke, Helsinki, available at http://www.tieke.fi/mp/db/file_library/x/IMG/20815/file/julkaisu_28.pdf (accessed
R. Bell, E. Dales (2008)
ReviewsSerials Review, 34
Michael Stephens (2007)
Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the Hyperlinked LibrarySerials Review, 33
(2005)
Do libraries matter? The rise of library
(2006)
The public library: a new version
K. McCain (1991)
Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysisJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 42
Gunilla Widén, Isto Huvila, Hazel Hall, Outi Nivakoski, Maria Kronqvist-Berg, H. Francke (2009)
New modes of information behavior emerging from the social web
(2006)
BibExcel - a bibliometric toolbox
(2006)
Levels of the game: The hierarchy of web 2.0 applications”, available at http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/07/levels-of-the-gamethe-hierarc.html (accessed
K. Curran, Michelle Murray, David Norrby, Martin Christian (2006)
Involving the user Through Library 2.0New Review of Information Networking, 12
Richard Wallis (2007)
WEB 2.0 TO LIBRARY 2.0 – FROM DEBATE TO REALITYNew Review of Information Networking, 13
L. Leydesdorff (1987)
Various methods for the mapping of scienceScientometrics, 11
J. Courtial (1994)
A coword analysis of scientometricsScientometrics, 31
S. Gibbons (2003)
Building upon the MyLibrary Concept to Better Meet the Information Needs of College StudentsD Lib Mag., 9
(1979)
Mapping the structure of science”, in Garfield, E. (Ed.), Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities
Meredith Farkas (2007)
Social Software in Libraries: Building Collaboration, Communication, and Community Online
P. Anderson (2007)
What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education
D. Price (1965)
Little Science, Big Science
K. Boyack, R. Klavans, K. Börner (2004)
Mapping the backbone of scienceScientometrics, 64
Nicole Mitchell (2008)
Library 2.0: A guide to participatory library serviceJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59
T. Cahlik (2000)
Comparison of the Maps of ScienceScientometrics, 49
K. McCain (1998)
Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary fieldScientometrics, 41
S. Griffin (1998)
NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Libraries Initiative: A Program Manager's PerspectiveD Lib Mag., 4
H. Fitzgerald (2007)
Review of: Farkas, Meredith G. Social software in libraries: building collaboration, communication, and community online. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., 2007Inf. Res., 12
P. Anderson (2007)
`All That Glisters Is Not Gold' — Web 2.0 And The LibrarianJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 39
Tomihisa Kamada, S. Kawai (1989)
An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected GraphsInf. Process. Lett., 31
M. Fox (2006)
Riding the Waves of “Web 2.0”
D. Noh, S. Min (2010)
A Study on the Awareness of Academic Librarians about "Ten Technology Ideas Your Library"Journal of The Korean Society for Information Management, 27
(2006)
Web 2.0 for libraries: Best practices for social software
Amy Benson, R. Favini (2006)
Evolving Web, Evolving LibrarianLibrary Hi Tech News, 23
K. Coombs (2007)
Building a Library Web Site on the Pillars of Web 2.0.Computers in libraries, 27
(2006)
Toward Academic Library 2.0: Development and Application of a Library 2.0 Methodology, School of Information and Library
P. Miller (2006)
Coming Together around Library 2.0: A Focus for Discussion and a Call to ArmsD Lib Mag., 12
(2006)
Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and Radical Trust: A First Take, available at: http:// library2.usask.ca
(2006)
Web 2.0 compact definition: Trying again
P. Miller (2005)
Web 2.0: Building the New Library
Suzanne Cohen, John Fereira, Angela Horne, Bob Kibbee, Holly Mistlebauer, Adam Smith (2000)
MyLibrary: Personalized Electronic Services in the Cornell University LibraryD Lib Mag., 6
E. Connor (2007)
Medical Librarian 2.0Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 26
M. Allen (2008)
Web 2.0: An argument against convergenceFirst Monday, 13
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to define both theoretically and empirically the concept of Library 2.0. Design/methodology/approach – Written answers to the question “What is Library 2.0?” given by practitioners and researchers ( n =29) interested in Library 2.0 issues were analyzed by using co‐word analysis to map the underlying elements of the concept. Findings – The study resulted in a model of Library 2.0, containing seven building‐blocks of the phenomenon: interactivity, users, participation, libraries and library services, web and web 2.0, social aspects, and technology and tools. Research limitations/implications – The model provides a basis for framing Library 2.0 as a research object and to map central themes of future research. Practical implications – A comprehensive model enables both researchers and practitioners to frame the phenomenon more clearly, evaluate existing and planned services and their proximity to what is Library 2.0. Originality/value – Unlike earlier proposals for a definition of the notion Library 2.0, the present study presents an empirical and consensual crowd‐sourcing approach of defining the concept Library 2.0 and provides basis for discussing the future evolution of the notion and its implications for library and information science research and library practices.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 24, 2009
Keywords: Process planning; Libraries; Internet; Electronic media
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.