Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Pinfield (2001)
The changing role of subject librarians in academic librariesJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 33
M. Pazzani (2002)
Adaptive interfaces for ubiquitous web access
Birger Hjørland (2002)
Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovativeJ. Documentation, 58
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff
The dynamics of innovation: from the national systems and ‘mode 2’ to triple helix of university‐industry‐government relations
C. Sunstein (2007)
Republic.com 2.0
Jannica Heinström (2005)
Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behaviorJ. Documentation, 61
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2000)
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and
OECD
Trends in the Information Economy
Leonardo Candela, D. Castelli, P. Pagano (2009)
On-demand virtual research environments and the changing roles of librariansLibr. Hi Tech, 27
J. Carpenter, L. Wetheridge, N. Smith
Researchers of Tomorrow: Annual Report 2009‐2010
J.V. Martin (1982)
Subject specialization in British university libraries: a second surveyJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 28
Google Official Blog
Personalized search for everyone
L. Leydesdorff, M. Meyer
Triple helix indicators of knowledge‐based innovation systems: introduction to the special issue
OECD
New Indicators for the Knowledge‐Based Economy: Proposals for Future Work
A. Kaushik (2009)
Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of Customer Centricity
B. Godin (2006)
The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31
J.M. Neway
Information Specialist as Team Player in the Research Process
Laura James, John Norman, Anne-Sophie Baets, Ingrid Burchell-Hughes, Helen Burchmore, Amyas Philips, D. Sheppard, Linda Wilks, J. Wolffe (2009)
The lives and technologies of early career researchers
Neil Thurman (2011)
Making ‘The Daily Me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized newsJournalism, 12
Judith Wusteman
Virtual research environments: Issues and opportunities for librarians
Tim Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila (2001)
The Semantic Web" in Scientific American
T. Anderson, H. Kanuka
E‐research: Methods, Strategies and Issues
Cameron Neylon, Shirley Wu (2008)
Open Science: Tools, Approaches, and ImplicationsPacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
Eli Pariser (2011)
The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You
OECD
National Systems of Innovation: Definitions, Conceptual Foundations and Initial Steps in the Comparative Analysis
RIN
The value of libraries for research and researchers
B. Lundvall, B. Johnson (1994)
The Learning EconomyIndustry and Innovation, 1
European Commission
Mobilizing the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon strategy
L. Leydesdorff, M. Meyer (2006)
Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems, Research Policy (forthcoming)
E. Collins, M. Jubb (2012)
How do Researchers in the Humanities Use Information ResourcesThe Liber Quarterly, 21
G. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, Nathan Bos (2008)
Scientific Collaboration on the Internet
G. Dosi, P. Llerena, M. Labini (2006)
The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’Research Policy, 35
M. Weller (2011)
The digital scholar : how technology is transforming scholarly practice
V. Jeevan, P. Padhi (2006)
A selective review of research in content personalizationLibrary Review, 55
D.J. Foskett
Classification and Indexing in the Social Sciences
T. Berners‐Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila
The semantic web
Ina Fourie (2004)
Librarians and the claiming of new roles: how can we try to make a difference?Aslib Proc., 56
Birger Hjørland (2011)
Kompetencer i forskningsbibliotekerne i historisk og aktuel belysning. Udviklingsbehov i perspektiv af digitaliseringen, 7
M. Jubb (2010)
Challenges for Libraries in Difficult Economic Times: Evidence from the UKThe Liber Quarterly, 20
Marcy Light, M. Maybury (2002)
Personalized multimedia information accessCommun. ACM, 45
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
W. Dutton, P. Jeffreys (2010)
World Wide Research: Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities
N. Negroponte
Being Digital
M. Cotta-Schønberg (2007)
The changing role of the subject specialistThe Liber Quarterly, 17
Birger Hjørland, H. Albrechtsen (1995)
Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-AnalysisJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 46
S. Kroll, R. Forsman
A Slice of Research Life: Information Support for Research in the United States
R. Procter, Robin Williams, J. Stewart, Meik Poschen, H. Snee, A. Voss, Marzieh Asgari-Targhi (2010)
Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communicationsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368
J. Wusteman
Editorial: virtual research environments – issues and opportunities for librarians
Purpose – The article aims to identify areas of potential research support that none of the traditional supportive actors (libraries, IT units, information units) have concerned themselves with, arguing for new tasks and roles for the academic library, specifically the special librarian. Design/methodology/approach – Areas of “overload” in the digital practice of contemporary researchers are identified and then connected to various personalized digital tools. The article explores the idea that attention to new aspects of researchers information needs creates a potential for developing personalized meta‐services at academic libraries. Findings – It is possible to identify a wealth of new services that can, if put into practice, substantially redefine the relationship between academic librarians and researchers. This entails a turn from service aimed at novice users to sophisticated end‐users. Such ideas also carry implications for LIS education programs and the need to build on special librarians who uphold competence in distinct knowledge domains. Two forms of domain‐specific meta‐services are explored: as support for collaboration and support for presentation. Practical implications – It is suggested that academic libraries systematically utilize the “full cost” model of project funding in order to exhibit concrete benefits of personalized meta‐services. The article holds implications for both academic libraries and for LIS educational institutions. Originality/value – Personalized meta‐services constitute a relatively fresh topic and have previously not been explored in connection with academic libraries.
Library Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 22, 2013
Keywords: Academic libraries; Special librarian; Personalization; Personalized meta‐services; Knowledge‐based economy; Information overload; Knowledge domains
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.