Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Post, Edwin Murray, R. Dickie, J. Mahon (1983)
The Public Affairs FunctionCalifornia Management Review, 26
Jean-Philippe Bonardi, Guy Holburn, R. Bergh (2006)
Nonmarket Strategy Performance: Evidence from U.S. Electric UtilitiesAcademy of Management Journal, 49
P. Xie, X. He, H. Yan
Corporate non‐market strategy theoretical system and its inherent dominant mechanism
J.E. Post, E.A. Jr Murray, R.B. Dickie, J.F. Mahon
Managing public affairs: the public affairs function
Robert Stern, J. Pfeffer, G. Salancik (1979)
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.Contemporary Sociology, 8
Louis Schwartz, A. Hirschman (1972)
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and StatesUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 120
K.A. Getz
Research in corporate political action integration and assessment
D. Baron (2001)
Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy
D. Baron (1997)
Integrated Strategy, Trade Policy, and Global CompetitionCalifornia Management Review, 39
P. Xie, Z. Wang, H. Zhu
Study on integrating corporate non‐market strategy with market strategy from an institutional perspective
Y.Q. He
A research on the behaviors of integrating market and non‐market environment for Chinese firms
Yuanqiong He, Zhilong Tian (2008)
Government-Oriented Corporate Public Relation Strategies in Transitional ChinaManagement and Organization Review, 4
Ming-Jer Chen, I. MacMillan (1992)
Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action IrreversibilityAcademy of Management Journal, 35
J. Snyder (1991)
ON BUYING LEGISLATURESEconomics and Politics, 3
M.E. Porter, M.R. Kramer
The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
D. Bach, D.B. Allen
What every CEO needs to know about non‐market strategy
Z. Tian, S. Fan
A study of competitive interaction of corporate market and non‐market behaviors in China's real estate industry
G. Sun
Political management and effect analysis of foreign enterprises
Bonardi Jean-Philippe (1999)
Market and Nonmarket Strategies During Deregulation: The Case of British TelecomBusiness and Politics, 1
K. Getz (1997)
Research in Corporate Political ActionBusiness & Society, 36
Z.D. Huang
A embedding model of corporate political strategy
T.J. Quasney
Competitive Interaction: A Study of Market, Non‐Market and Integrated Competitive Behavior
W. Judge, T. Douglas (1998)
Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical AssessmentJournal of Management Studies, 35
D. Baron (1999)
Integrated Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Client and Interest Group PoliticsBusiness and Politics, 1
R.W. Ackerman, R.A. Bauer
Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma
B. Shaffer, Thomas Quasney, C. Grimm (2000)
Firm Level Performance Implications of Nonmarket ActionsBusiness & Society, 39
X.M. Deng, D. Zhu
The firm's integration model of market and non‐market strategy and its performance implications
A. Hillman, Asghar Zardkoohi, L. Bierman (1999)
Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm‐specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. governmentStrategic Management Journal, 20
Z. Tian, Y. Gao, W. Wei
A study of corporate political strategy in China
E. Salorio, J. Boddewyn, Nicolas Dahan (2005)
Integrating Business Political Behavior with Economic and Organizational StrategiesInternational Studies of Management & Organization, 35
Z. Tian, X. Deng, T. Hafsi
Corporate market behaviors, non‐market behaviors, and competitive interactions: the case study of Chinese white goods industry
The Chinese Entrepreneurs Survey System
The status and development of Chinese enterprises management team system construction
P. Brønn, C. Brønn (2002)
Issues management as a basis for strategic orientationJournal of Public Affairs, 2
B. Shaffer, A. Hillman (2000)
The development of business–government strategies by diversified firmsStrategic Management Journal, 21
Ken Smith, C. Grimm, M. Gannon (1992)
Dynamics of Competitive Strategy
L.M. Feng, Y. Huang, Y. Di
The market and non‐market strategy in multinational operations
J. Boddewyn (2003)
Understanding and Advancing the Concept of `Nonmarket'Business & Society, 42
Jean-Philippe Bonardi (2004)
Global and political strategies in deregulated industries: the asymmetric behaviors of former monopoliesSouthern Medical Journal, 25
D.P. Baron
The non‐market strategy system
Martin Meznar, D. Nigh (1995)
Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American FirmsAcademy of Management Journal, 38
Yuanqiong He, Zhilong Tian, Yun-You Chen (2007)
Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in ChinaAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 24
A. Hillman, M. Hitt (1999)
Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy DecisionsAcademy of Management Review, 24
D. Baron (1995)
Integrated Strategy: Market and Nonmarket ComponentsCalifornia Management Review, 37
J. Post, Edwin Murray, R. Dickie, J. Mahon (1982)
The public affairs function in American corporations: Development and relations with corporate planningLong Range Planning, 15
Purpose – This paper aims to systematically examine the key notion of integration of non‐market and market strategies in the increasingly popular study of corporate non‐market strategies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on a brief literature review of the non‐market strategy (NMS) research that shows the existing literature does not offer a clear and systematic account of the key notion of integration. It suggests any systematic account of integration should address at least three interrelated questions, i.e. why, what and how to integrate non‐market and market strategies? Findings – For the why question, the authors use a formal model to demonstrate that the essence of the most important type of integration synergy lies in the positive spillover or externality from non‐market to market strategies. For the what question, the authors identify the contents of integration at three levels, i.e. the level of non‐market environment analysis, the level of NMS choice, and the level of non‐market dynamic interactions. For the how question, the authors argue that the combination of non‐market and market strategies should be seamless in terms of horizontal, vertical and intentional coordination. Overall, the authors argue, only when the right contents are combined and seamlessly coordinated will there be high synergies from integration of non‐market and market strategies. Practical implications – Managers are advised to give non‐market strategies full attention. Managers charged with non‐market tasks should explore how to seamlessly coordinate non‐market and market strategies in order to gain maximal synergies. Originality/value – This paper is the first to examine the key notion of integration in a systematic manner. It is the first to propose a three‐question solution to systematic understanding of the notion and the first to propose the seamless coordination concept and its associated three aspects of seamless coordination.
Nankai Business Review International – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 25, 2014
Keywords: Integration; Non‐market strategy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.