Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Borich, R. Jemelka (1981)
Programs and systems, an evaluation perspective
R. Hall (1995)
Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale.Psychosomatics, 36 3
W. Dailey, M. Chinman, L. Davidson, L. Garner, E. Vavrousek-Jakuba, S. Essock, Ken Marcus, J. Tebes (2000)
How Are We Doing? A Statewide Survey of Community Adjustment Among People with Serious Mental Illness Receiving Intensive Outpatient ServicesCommunity Mental Health Journal, 36
W. Hudson, S. McIntosh (1981)
The Assessment of Spouse Abuse: Two Quantifiable Dimensions.Journal of Marriage and Family, 43
D. Satcher (2001)
Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity—A Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General
M. Armstrong, S. Huz, M. Evans (1992)
What works for whom: the design and evaluation of children's mental health services.Social work research & abstracts, 28 1
L. Snowden (1999)
African American service use for mental health problemsJournal of Community Psychology, 27
M. Straus, S. Hamby, Sue Boney-McCoy, D. Sugarman (1996)
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)Journal of Family Issues, 17
A. Wandersman, P. Imm, Matthew Chinman, S. Kaftarian (2000)
Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountabilityEvaluation and Program Planning, 23
K. Feldhaus, J. Koziol-Mclain, H. Amsbury, I. Norton, S. Lowenstein, J. Abbott (1997)
Accuracy of 3 Brief Screening Questions for Detecting Partner Violence in the Emergency DepartmentJAMA, 277
This article describes a quality assurance effort aimed at defining the characteristics of the patient population of the Connecticut Mental Health Center, a state-funded agency that provides comprehensive clinical and rehabilitative services to persons with mental illness. Also described is how this information guided management decisions in both caseload distribution and clinical service development. This "Patient Profile Project" was informed by research principles which view evaluation as continual, rather than terminal activity that involves key stakeholders from all levels within the mental health system of care and makes maximum use of data in ongoing performance improvement initiatives. The service-need index that the project produced represents our first efforts to accurately capture service need and use it in clinical decision making. This review of the Connecticut Mental Health Center Patient Profile Project illustrates the utility of a continuous evaluation system in promoting improvements in a large mental health treatment system.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 2002
Keywords: Evaluation; Service; Quality assurance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.