Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Chan (1997)
Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.The Journal of applied psychology, 82 1
Thomas Becker (2005)
Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test of Employee IntegrityInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13
Jeff Weekley, Robert Ployhart (2013)
Situational Judgment Tests : Theory, Measurement, and Application
Matthew O’Connell, N. Hartman, Michael McDaniel, W. Grubb, Amie Lawrence (2007)
Incremental Validity of Situational Judgment Tests for Task and Contextual Job PerformanceInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15
Jeff Weekley, Casey Jones (1997)
Video-based situational testing.Personnel Psychology, 50
Deborah Whetzel, Michael McDaniel, N. Nguyen (2008)
Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-AnalysisHuman Performance, 21
Wendy Richman-Hirsch, Julie Olson-Buchanan, F. Drasgow (2000)
Examining the impact of administration medium on examine perceptions and attitudes.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 6
Ute Hülsheger, N. Anderson (2009)
Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going Beyond Preference ReactionsWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment
Michael Cullen, P. Sackett, F. Lievens (2006)
Threats to the Operational Use of Situational Judgment Tests in the College Admission ProcessWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment
D. Hunter (2003)
Measuring General Aviation Pilot Judgment Using a Situational Judgment TechniqueThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13
D. Chan, N. Schmitt (2002)
Situational Judgment and Job PerformanceHuman Performance, 15
Michael McDaniel, F. Morgeson, E. Finnegan, M. Campion, Eric Braverman (2001)
Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 4
Uwe Funke, H. Schuler (1998)
Validity of Stimulus and Response Components in a Video Test of Social CompetenceInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6
J. Clevenger, G. Pereira, D. Wiechmann, N. Schmitt, V. Harvey (2001)
Incremental validity of situational judgment testsJournal of Applied Psychology, 86
Robert Ployhart, Mark Ehrhart (2003)
Be Careful What You Ask For: Effects of Response Instructions on the Construct Validity and Reliability of Situational Judgment TestsInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11
A. Dalessio (1994)
predicting insurance agent turnover using a video-based situational judgment testJournal of Business and Psychology, 9
Denise Potosky, P. Bobko (2004)
Selection Testing via the Internet: Practical Considerations and Exploratory Empirical Findings*Personnel Psychology, 57
F. Lievens, P. Sackett (2006)
Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: a comparison in terms of predictive validity.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 5
N. Nguyen, M. Biderman, Michael McDaniel (2005)
Effects of Response Instructions on Faking a Situational Judgment TestInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13
E. Pulakos, N. Schmitt (1996)
An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related ValidityHuman Performance, 9
M. Bergman, F. Drasgow, Michelle Donovan, Jaime Henning, Suzanne Juraska (2006)
Scoring Situational Judgment Tests: Once You Get the Data, Your Troubles BeginWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1998)
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 124
F. Oswald, N. Schmitt, Brian Kim, Lauren Ramsay, M. Gillespie (2004)
Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 2
Uwe Kanning, K. Grewe, Stefan Hollenberg, Monika Hadouch (2006)
From the Subjects' Point of View Reactions to Different Types of Situational Judgment Items
Michael McDaniel, N. Hartman, Deborah Whetzel, W. Grubb (2007)
SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 60
Robert Ployhart (2006)
Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic OpportunitiesJournal of Management, 32
F. Oswald, A. Friede, N. Schmitt, Brian Kim, Lauren Ramsay (2005)
Extending a Practical Method for Developing Alternate Test Forms Using Independent Sets of ItemsOrganizational Research Methods, 8
Robert Ployhart, Jeff Weekley, Brian Holtz, Cary Kemp (2003)
WEB‐BASED AND PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TESTING OF APPLICANTS IN A PROCTORED SETTING: ARE PERSONALITY, BIODATA, AND SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS COMPARABLE?Personnel Psychology, 56
F. Morgeson, Matthew Reider, M. Campion (2005)
SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGEPersonnel Psychology, 58
John Hausknecht, D. Day, Scott Thomas (2004)
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-AnalysisPersonnel Psychology, 57
M. Bruce, D. Learner (1958)
A Supervisory Practices TestPersonnel Psychology, 11
H. Peeters, F. Lievens (2005)
Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of FakingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 65
(2003)
New development in SJTs: scoring, coaching and incremental validity", paper presented at the 19th annual convention of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
M. Stevens, M. Campion (1999)
Staffing Work Teams: Development and Validation of a Selection Test for Teamwork SettingsJournal of Management, 25
R. Wagner, R. Sternberg (1985)
Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
M. Cook (2004)
Personnel Selection: Adding Value Through People
L. Cronbach, G. Gleser (1958)
Psychological tests and personnel decisionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 53
Udo Konradt, Guido Hertel, Karin Joder (2003)
Web-Based Assessment of Call Center Agents: Development and Validation of a Computerized InstrumentInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11
Jeff Weekley, Casey Jones (1999)
FURTHER STUDIES OF SITUATIONAL TESTSPersonnel Psychology, 52
S. Motowidlo, M. Dunnette, G. Carter (1990)
An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
S. Motowidlo, A. Hooper, Hannah Jackson (2006)
Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 4
Michael McDaniel, N. Nguyen (2001)
Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Practice and Constructs AssessedInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9
Uwe Kanning, K. Grewe, Stefan Hollenberg, Monika Hadouch (2006)
From the Subjects' Point of ViewEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22
F. Lievens, Tine Buyse, P. Sackett (2005)
The operational validity of a video-based situational judgment test for medical college admissions: illustrating the importance of matching predictor and criterion construct domains.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 3
A. Ryan, L. McFarland, Helen Shl (1999)
AN INTERNATIONAL LOOK AT SELECTION PRACTICES: NATION AND CULTURE AS EXPLANATIONS FOR VARIABILITY IN PRACTICEPersonnel Psychology, 52
(1994)
“ Multimedia testing ”
Michael McDaniel, Deborah Whetzel (2005)
Situational judgment test research : Informing the debate on practical intelligence theoryIntelligence, 33
Catherine Clause, Morell Mullins, Marguerite Nee, E. Pulakos, N. Schmitt (1998)
PARALLEL TEST FORM DEVELOPMENT: A PROCEDURE FOR ALTERNATE PREDICTORS AND AN EXAMPLEPersonnel Psychology, 51
F. Lievens (2006)
International Situational Judgment Tests
F. Lievens, P. Sackett (2007)
Situational judgment tests in high-stakes settings: issues and strategies with generating alternate forms.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 4
Julie Olson-Buchanan, F. Drasgow, P. Moberg, A. Mead, P. Keenan, Michelle Donovan (1998)
INTERACTIVE VIDEO ASSESSMENT OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLSPersonnel Psychology, 51
P. Costa, A. Terracciano, R. McCrae (2001)
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 2
F. Lievens, Tine Buyse, P. Sackett (2005)
RETEST EFFECTS IN OPERATIONAL SELECTION SETTINGS: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A FRAMEWORKPersonnel Psychology, 58
(2001)
Predicting job performance using situational judgment tests: a clarification of the literature
D. Smiderle, Brenda Perry, Steven Cronshaw (1994)
Evaluation of video-based assessment in transit operator selectionJournal of Business and Psychology, 9
Anita McClough, S. Rogelberg (2003)
Selection in Teams: An Exploration of the Teamwork Knowledge, Skills, and Ability TestInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11
J. Vantassel-Baska (2001)
Book Review: The g-factor, the science of mental abilityGifted Child Quarterly, 45
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to give an empirically‐based review of the strengths and weaknesses of situational judgment tests (SJTs). Design/methodology/approach – The features, history, and development of SJTs are discussed. Next, a computerized search (from 1990‐2007) is conducted to retrieve empirical studies related to SJTs. The effectiveness of SJTs is discussed in terms of reliability, criterion‐related validity, incremental validity, construct‐related validity, utility, adverse impact, applicant perceptions, fakability, and susceptibility to practice and coaching effects. Findings – Strengths of SJTs are that they show criterion‐related validity and incremental validity above cognitive ability and personality tests. SJTs have also less adverse impact towards minorities (especially if the cognitive loading of the SJT is low). Furthermore, applicant reactions towards SJTs are positive and SJTs enable to test large applicant groups at once (through the Internet). In terms of weaknesses, SJTs might be prone to faking, practice, and coaching effects. There is also debate about what constructs are measured by SJTs. Research limitations/implications – Five avenues for future research are discussed: construct‐related validity of SJTs, utility of SJTs vis‐à‐vis other predictors, impact of SJT features on validity and adverse impact, examination of alternative stimulus and response formats, and cross‐cultural transportability of SJTs. Practical implications – Practitioners receive evidence‐based information about the features, development, and strengths and weaknesses of SJTs. Originality/value – Apart from the USA, SJTs have not made strong inroads in selection practice in Europe and other parts of the world. This evidence‐based paper might highlight the value of SJTs.
Personnel Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 6, 2008
Keywords: Selection; Interpersonal skills; Human resourcing; Aptitude tests; Competences
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.