Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Purpose – This article introduces a three‐part approach to improving the results of discovery programs. Design/methodology/approach – The authors studied successful R&D programs to determine the right elements of a process for discovery‐based innovation that improved the commercial focus of invention without disturbing the subtle creative dynamics of a successful research organization. Findings – The search led the authors to the following three‐part approach: run discovery as a separate business, not as part of a business; focus on the economics of the process, not of the project; focus on decision‐making effectiveness, not functional efficiency. Research limitations/implications – The financial impact of authors’ approach needs to be studied and validated. Practical implications – The authors’ approach provides managers with clear guidelines for structuring their research discovery programs. Originality/value – The authors’ approach contradicts much conventional thinking.
Strategy & Leadership – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2005
Keywords: Innovation; Pharmaceuticals industry; Resource allocation; Research and development; Discovery‐driven planning
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.