Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J.P. Morgan
RiskMetrics 1
Dirk Tasche (2002)
Expected shortfall and beyondJournal of Banking and Finance, 26
H. Brachinger, Martin Weber (1997)
Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived riskOperations-Research-Spektrum, 19
S. Jaschke (2001)
Quantile-Var is the Wrong Measure to Quantify Market Risk for Regulatory PurposesRisk Management
T. Fischer
Examples of coherent risk measures depending on one‐sided moments
H. Markowitz
Portfolio selection
C. Acerbi, Dirk Tasche (2001)
On the coherence of expected shortfallJournal of Banking and Finance, 26
Philippe Artzner, F. Delbaen, J. Eber, D. Heath (1999)
Coherent Measures of RiskMathematical Finance, 9
Phhilippe Jorion (2000)
Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk
J.L. Wirch, M.R. Hardy
Distortion Risk Measure: Coherence and Stochastic Dominance
Shaun Wang (1996)
Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium DensityASTIN Bulletin, 26
H. Rootzén, C. Küppelberg
A single number cannot hedge against economic catastrophes
M. Hall (1996)
The amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market riskMoneta e Credito, 49
C. Acerbi, C. Nordio, C. Sirtori (2001)
Expected Shortfall as a Tool for Financial Risk ManagementarXiv: Statistical Mechanics
C. Acerbi, Dirk Tasche (2001)
Expected Shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to Value at Risk
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
The Basel Capital Accord
Yasuhiro Yamai, Toshinao Yoshiba (2002)
Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk: Their Estimation Error, Decomposition, and OptimizationMonetary and and Economic Studies, 20
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
International Convergence of Capital Measurements and Capital Standards
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
Amendment to the Basel Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risk
Yasuhiro Yamai, Toshinao Yoshiba (2002)
On the Validity of Value-at-Risk: Comparative Analyses with Expected ShortfallMonetary and and Economic Studies, 20
Yasuhiro Yamai, Toshinao Yoshiba (2002)
Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk (2): Expected Utility Maximization and Tail RiskMonetary and and Economic Studies, 20
It is shown that the widely used risk measures standard deviation and value at risk do not always reflect risk preferences accurately. To overcome these problems in risk measurement a class of coherent risk measures has been proposed. We introduce the idea behind these measures and provide an overview of suggested coherent risk measures. Finally it is shown where the limitations of such measures in practical applications are and how regulatory bodies responded to their introduction in the literature. We find that most contributions on coherent risk measurement come from the actuarial sciences and propagate a widening of the discussion among researchers and practitioners in other industries.
Balance Sheet – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2002
Keywords: Risk; Measurement; Value; Risk management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.