Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/attitudes-towards-benefits-among-entrepreneurial-employees-ydyPd7Kj0m
References (31)
-
W. Cascio (1989)
Managing Human Resources -
B. DiFiore (2000)
Small business no longer has to mean small benefits.Employee benefits journal, 25 3
-
Shawn Carraher (1991)
On the Dimensionality of the Pay Satisfaction QuestionnairePsychological Reports, 69
-
D. Yousef (2001)
Islamic work ethic – A moderator between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in a cross‐cultural contextPersonnel Review, 30
-
Stephen Kerr (1999)
Organizational rewards: Practical, cost-neutral alternatives that you may know, but don't practiceOrganizational Dynamics, 28
-
S. Joo, John Grable (2000)
Improving Employee Productivity: The Role of Financial Counseling and EducationJournal of Employment Counseling, 37
-
D. Herz, Joseph Meisenheimer, H. Weinstein (2000)
Health and retirement benefits: data from two BLS surveysMonthly Labor Review, 123
-
Philip Lewis (2000)
Exploring Lawler’s new pay theory through the case of Finbank’s reward strategy for managersPersonnel Review, 29
-
Shawn Carraher (1991)
A Validity Study of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51
-
C. Meyer, S. Mukerjee, A. Sestero (2001)
Work-Family Benefits: Which Ones Maximize Profits? [*]Journal of Managerial Issues, 13
-
W. Zwick, W. Velicer (1986)
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.Psychological Bulletin, 99
-
D. Hart (1990)
The effects of perceived reward contingencies, recognition, and benefits equity on turnover functionality -
John Simmons (2001)
Flexible Benefits for Small EmployersJournal of accountancy, 191
-
D. Balkin, R. Griffeth (1993)
The determinants of employee benefits satisfactionJournal of Business and Psychology, 7
-
I. Clark (1999)
Corporate human resources and “bottom line” financial performancePersonnel Review, 28
-
M. Sturman, J. Short (2000)
LUMP‐SUM BONUS SATISFACTION: TESTING THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW PAY SATISFACTION DIMENSIONPersonnel Psychology, 53
-
J. Horn (1965)
A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysisPsychometrika, 30
-
H. Heneman, Robyn Berkley (1999)
Applicant Attraction Practices and Outcomes among Small BusinessesJournal of Small Business Management, 37
-
R. Jennings (2001)
Cash or AccrualJournal of accountancy, 191
-
S. Lambert (2000)
Added Benefits: The Link Between Work-Life Benefits and Organizational Citizenship BehaviorAcademy of Management Journal, 43
-
10.2307/1556411
-
10.1111/j.1936-4490.1998.tb00177.x
-
R. Rice, S. Phillips, D. McFarlin (1990)
Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
-
C. Truss (2001)
Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational OutcomesJournal of Management Studies, 38
-
D. Hart, Shawn Carraher (1995)
The Development of an Instrument to Measure Attitudes toward BenefitsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 55
-
V. Sethi, Shawn Carraher (1993)
Developing Measures for Assessing the Organizational Impact of Information Technology: A Comment on Mahmood and Soon's PaperDecision Sciences, 24
-
R. Mangel, M. Useem (2000)
The strategic role of gainsharingJournal of Labor Research, 21
-
10.5465/amr.2001.4378017
-
Shawn Carraher, M. Buckley (1996)
Cognitive complexity and the perceived dimensionality of pay satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
-
R. Sitgreaves (1979)
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).Psyccritiques, 24
-
H. Heneman, D. Schwab (1985)
Pay satisfaction: its multidimensional nature and measurement.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 20 1
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2003 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0048-3486
- DOI
- 10.1108/00483480310498666
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The dimensionality of a multi‐dimensional questionnaire – the Attitudes Towards Benefits Scale (ATBS) – was examined using a principal components analysis with an orthogonal rotation and multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis for a sample of 851 employees of entrepreneurial organizations in the USA. As previously found by Hart and Carraher, it is found that the questionnaire contains three separate dimensions of attitudes towards benefits.
Journal
Personnel Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2003
Keywords: Benefits; Compensation; Pay structures; United States of America