Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Golicic (2007)
A comparison of shipper and carrier relationship strengthInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37
Thomas Puschmann, R. Alt (2005)
Successful use of e‐procurement in supply chainsSupply Chain Management, 10
J. Wiley, I. Wilkinson, Louise Young (2006)
The nature, role and impact of connected relations: a comparison of European and Chinese suppliers' perspectivesJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21
K. Kirytopoulos, V. Leopoulos, D. Voulgaridou (2008)
Supplier selection in pharmaceutical industryBenchmarking: An International Journal, 15
F. Liu, H. Hai (2005)
The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplierInternational Journal of Production Economics, 97
S. Teng, H. Jaramillo (2005)
A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chainsInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35
J.J. Dorsch, M.M. Yasin
A framework for benchmarking in the public sector – literature review and directions for future research
A. Charnes, W. Cooper, E. Rhodes (1978)
Measuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2
J. Thakkar, A. Kanda, S. Deshmukh (2007)
Evaluation of buyer‐supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic matrix: The case study of Indian automotive SMEsJournal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19
A. Pressey, N. Tzokas, H. Winklhofer (2007)
Strategic purchasing and the evaluation of “problem” key supply relationships: what do key suppliers need to know?Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22
P. Burcher, Gloria Lee, A. Sohal (2005)
A cross country comparison of careers in logistics management in Australia and BritainThe International Journal of Logistics Management, 16
Jeffrey Dorsch, M. Yasin (1998)
A framework for benchmarking in the public sectorInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 11
C. Mena, A. Humphries, R. Wilding (2009)
A comparison of inter- and intra-organizational relationships: Two case studies from UK food and drink industryInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39
S. Fawcett, Chad Allred, G. Magnan, Jeffrey Ogden (2009)
Benchmarking the viability of SCM for entrepreneurial business model designBenchmarking: An International Journal, 16
F. Chan, H. Qi, H. Chan, H. Lau, R. Ip (2003)
A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR SUPPLY CHAINSManagement Decision, 41
Khurrum Bhutta, F. Huq (2002)
Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approachesSupply Chain Management, 7
J.P. Brans, B. Mareschal
Promethee method
W. Wong, K. Wong (2008)
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measuresBenchmarking: An International Journal, 15
G. Anand, R. Kodali (2008)
Benchmarking the benchmarking modelsBenchmarking: An International Journal, 15
J. Thakkar, A. Kanda, S.G. Deshmukh
Evaluation of buyer‐supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic matrix
R.S. Barr, L.M. Seiford
Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis
Adisak Theeranuphattana, John Tang (2007)
A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains: Alternative considerationsJournal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19
W. Wong, K. Wong (2007)
Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modelingInd. Manag. Data Syst., 107
P. Andersen, N. Petersen (1993)
A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysisManagement Science, 39
P. Burcher, Gloria Lee, A. Sohal (2007)
Production and operations managers and logistics managers: a cross‐country comparisonJournal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18
A. Athanassopoulos, J. Ballantine (1995)
Ratio and Frontier Analysis for Assessing Corporate Performance: Evidence from the Grocery Industry in the UKJournal of the Operational Research Society, 46
Teresa Wu, J. Blackhurst (2009)
Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approachInternational Journal of Production Research, 47
E. Bottani, A. Rizzi (2006)
A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics servicesSupply Chain Management, 11
A. Lockamy, Kevin McCormack (2004)
Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance: An exploratory studyInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24
S. Geary, Jan Zonnenberg (2000)
WHAT IT MEANS TO BE BEST IN CLASS.Supply Chain Management Review
A. Lockamy, K. McCormack
Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance
B. Andersen, Tom Fagerhaug, Stine Randmæl, Jürgen Schuldmaier, Johann Prenninger (1999)
Benchmarking supply chain management: finding best practicesJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14
S. Stephens (2001)
Supply Chain Operations Reference Model Version 5.0: A New Tool to Improve Supply Chain Efficiency and Achieve Best PracticeInformation Systems Frontiers, 3
Petri Niemi, Janne Huiskonen (2008)
An approach to improving logistical performance with cross‐unit benchmarkingBenchmarking: An International Journal, 15
D.A. Collier, J.E. Storbeck
A data envelopment approach to benchmarking in the telecommunications industry
J. Ayers (2000)
Supply-Chain Council
G. Büyüközkan, O. Feyzioğlu, Erdal Nebol (2008)
Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chainInternational Journal of Production Economics, 113
Á. Halldórsson, P. Larson, R. Poist (2008)
Supply chain management: a comparison of Scandinavian and American perspectivesInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38
R. Levary (2007)
Ranking foreign suppliers based on supply riskSupply Chain Management, 12
B. Shore, A. Venkatachalam (2003)
Evaluating the information sharing capabilities of supply chain partnersInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33
G. Stevens (1989)
Integrating the Supply ChainInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 19
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a method to compare supply chains (SCs) of an industry in the scope of supplier's supplier to customer's customer. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed method is based on five processes provided in SCOR model version 9.0 (plan, source, make, deliver and return) and main business stages of the industry. It uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and PROMETHEE II, a multiple criteria decision‐making technique, as tools to compare SCs in the process level, business stage level and SC level. Therefore, the method is basically a new combination of existing models and methods including SCOR model, DEA and PROMETHEE II. To show the applicability and strength of the method in comparing SCs, it has been implemented in the seven SCs of the Iran broiler industry as a case study. Findings – Comparing SCs of an industry via the proposed method results in process benchmarking, business stage benchmarking and SCs ranking in the scope of supplier's supplier to customer's customer. Originality/value – The suggested method provides realistic and attainable information for SCs' owner/managers to find out the strengths and weaknesses of their SCs and improve their performance by process benchmarking and business stage benchmarking. Also they could identify their competitive position in the industry by SCs ranking.
Supply Chain Management An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 15, 2011
Keywords: Supply chain management; Benchmarking; Iran
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.