In the world of gender research, “facts” abound. Unfortunately, the “facts” are often contradictory. Apparently we live in a society that is quite confused about sex, and gender, and all of the accouterments associated with both of these constructs. Befuddled minds turn to the field of psychology for answers to gender dilemmas, hoping that there, if anywhere, unified ideas around sex and gender may prevail. Yet a rudimentary literature review in the area quickly reveals that this is not the case. Age-old debates about nature versus nurture, essential similarity of the sexes versus essential differences between sexes, and so forth continue and take on new dimensions. So, psychology does not have the answer for society on gender, its development and its meaning, and in fact sends society-at-large conflicting messages each and every day. Taking this a step further, shouldn't counseling psychology, or clinical psychology, or developmental psychology, as subfields within psychology, have some unified perspectives on gender within themselves? Nope, still too optimistic; go look, and you will see just how un-unified these fields are. But surely, as these smaller fields are whittled down to ever more specialized areas of study – say, to developmental neuropsychology – some
/lp/elsevier/delusions-of-objectivity-the-science-of-gender-exposed-cO07jqY7eN