“Woah! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

A comparison of two models for dealing with urban solid waste: Management by contract and management by public–private partnership

A comparison of two models for dealing with urban solid waste: Management by contract and management by public–private partnership Highlights ► Management by public–private partnership (MPPP) generated 70% less residue in sanitary embankments than the management by contract (MC). ► MPPP to develop plans to enhance public awareness and to invest in environmental education in a more significant way than the MC. ► MPPP provided more job opportunities by expanding the number of collectors from 50 in the MC program to 600. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Resources, Conservation and Recycling" Elsevier
Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/a-comparison-of-two-models-for-dealing-with-urban-solid-waste-dtPIWvKRCi

You're reading a free preview. Subscribe to read or print the entire article.

And millions more from thousands of peer-reviewed journals, for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

To be the best researcher, you need access to the best research

  • With DeepDyve, you can stop worrying about how much articles cost, or if it's too much hassle to order — it's all at your fingertips. Your research is important and deserves the top content.
  • Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.
  • All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

Stop missing out on the latest updates in your field

  • We’ll send you automatic email updates on the keywords and journals you tell us are most important to you.
  • There is a lot of content out there, so we help you sift through it and stay organized.