Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Metcalfe, P. Monaghan (2001)
Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?Trends in ecology & evolution, 16 5
M. Dodd, J. Silvertown (2000)
Size-specific fecundity and the influence of lifetime size variation upon effective population size in Abies balsameaHeredity, 85
R. Jovani, R. Mavor, D. Oro (2008)
Hidden patterns of colony size variation in seabirds: a logarithmic point of viewOikos, 117
R. M. May (1975)
Ecology and evolution of communities
J. Gómez (2005)
Non-additive effects of herbivores and pollinators on Erysimum mediohispanicum (Cruciferae) fitnessOecologia, 143
R. Bak, E. Meesters (1998)
Coral population structure: the hidden information of colony size-frequency distributionsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 162
C. Herrera (2000)
MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF POLLINATORS AND HERBIVORES: EVIDENCE FOR NON-ADDITIVITY IN A PERENNIAL HERBEcology, 81
E. Limpert, W. Stahel, Markus Abbt (2001)
Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues, 51
G. Barrowclough, R. Rockwell (1993)
Variance of Lifetime Reproductive Success: Estimation Based on Demographic DataThe American Naturalist, 141
S. Munné‐Bosch (2007)
Aging in PerennialsCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 26
E. Brodie, A. Moore, F. Janzen (1995)
Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 10 8
(2008)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
C. Herrera, M. Medrano, P. Rey, A. Sánchez-Lafuente, María García, J. Guitian, A. Manzaneda (2002)
Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traitsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99
(1984)
Size inequalities and fitness in plant populations
R. Laird, L. Aarssen (2005)
Size inequality and the tragedy of the commons phenomenon in plant competitionPlant Ecology, 179
V. Grimm, U. Berger, F. Bastiansen, S. Eliassen, V. Ginot, J. Giske, J. Goss‐Custard, Tamara Grand, Simone Heinz, G. Huse, A. Huth, J. Jepsen, C. Jørgensen, W. Mooij, B. Müller, G. Pe’er, C. Piou, S. Railsback, A. Robbins, M. Robbins, E. Rossmanith, N. Rüger, E. Strand, S. Souissi, R. Stillman, Rune Vabø, U. Visser, D. DeAngelis (2006)
A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based modelsEcological Modelling, 198
Jacob Weiner, Peter Stoll, H. Muller‐Landau, A. Jasentuliyana (2001)
The Effects of Density, Spatial Pattern, and Competitive Symmetry on Size Variation in Simulated Plant PopulationsThe American Naturalist, 158
J. Weiner, O. Solbrig (1984)
The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populationsOecologia, 61
R. May (1975)
Patterns of species abundance and diversity
J. Lindström (1999)
Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.Trends in ecology & evolution, 14 9
E. Kraus (1943)
The Reproductive Capacity of PlantsEcology
R. Lamaestre, H. Bernas (2006)
Significance of lognormal nanocrystal size distributionsPhysical Review B, 73
C. Herrera (1991)
DISSECTING FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN PLANT FECUNDITYEcology, 72
T. Clutton‐Brock (1989)
Reproductive success : studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systemsThe Condor, 91
J. Weiner (1985)
Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual PlantsEcology, 66
R. Cook, E. Lyons (1983)
The Biology of Viola Fimbriatula in a Natural DisturbanceEcology, 64
C. Herrera (1988)
Variation in mutualisms : the spatio temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblageBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 35
V. Grimm, S. Railsback (2005)
Individual-based modeling and ecology
J. Harper (1979)
Population Biology of Plants
L. Kiss, J. Soderlund, G. Niklasson, C. Granqvist (1999)
New approach to the origin of lognormal size distributions of nanoparticlesNanotechnology, 10
C. Damgaard, J. Weiner (2000)
Describing inequality in plant size or fecundityEcology, 81
F. Hallé, R. Oldeman, P. Tomlinson (1978)
Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis
C. Herrera (2000)
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN PROGENY VIABILITY IN LAVANDULA LATIFOLIA: A LONG‐TERM FIELD STUDYEcology, 81
U. Wilensky (1999)
Netlogo
D. Wallre (1985)
THE GENESIS OF SIZE HIERARCHIES IN SEEDLING POPULATIONS OF IMPATIENS CAPENSIS MEERB.New Phytologist, 100
S. Bullock (1989)
Life history and seed dispersal of the short lived chaparral shrub dendromecon rigida papaveraceaeAmerican Journal of Botany, 76
C. Pfister, Forrest Stevens (2002)
THE GENESIS OF SIZE VARIABILITY IN PLANTS AND ANIMALSEcology, 83
C. Herrera, P. Bazaga (2009)
Quantifying the genetic component of phenotypic variation in unpedigreed wild plants: tailoring genomic scan for within‐population useMolecular Ecology, 18
C. Herrera (2002)
Topsoil properties and seedling recruitment in Lavandula latifolia: stage-dependence and spatial decoupling of influential parametersOikos, 97
J. Aitchison, Jessica Brown (1958)
The Lognormal Distribution., 8
C. Herrera (2001)
Deconstructing a floral phenotype: do pollinators select for corolla integration in Lavandula latifolia?Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14
I. Newton (1990)
Lifetime Reproduction in Birds
Samuel Scheiner (1987)
Size and fecundity hierarchies in an herbaceous perennialOecologia, 74
Individual variance in lifetime fecundity within populations is a life-history parameter of crucial evolutionary and ecological significance. However, knowledge of its magnitude and underlying mechanisms in natural populations is biased toward short-lived taxa. This paper summarizes results of a 23-year study on a population of the Mediterranean shrub Lavandula latifolia . We document the within-population pattern of individual variation in instantaneous and lifetime fecundity (as estimated by inflorescence production) and explore the mechanisms producing the lognormal distribution of individual fecundities by means of an individual-based simulation model. Throughout the study period, a few individuals consistently produced most inflorescences while the majority of plants exhibited moderate-to-low fecundities. The shape of yearly distributions of annual fecundities varied little across years, and most annual fecundity distributions did not depart significantly from a lognormal. The distribution of individual lifetime fecundity did not depart from lognormality. Despite the simplicity of the premises of our simulation model, it was remarkably successful at predicting the shapes of fecundity distributions and the early establishment of a persistent fecundity hierarchy. The agreement between model results and empirical data supports the view that multiplicative interactions of randomly varying environmental effects can play a central role in determining individual variation in lifetime fecundity in L. latifolia , and suggests that environmental stochasticity can be decisive in the genesis of strong fecundity hierarchies in long-lived plants.
Ecology – Ecological Society of America
Published: Feb 1, 2010
Keywords: demography ; fecundity hierarchy ; Lavandula latifolia; ; lognormal distribution ; multiplicative random effects ; plant senescence ; simulation model
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.