Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Topic selection in phatic communication

Topic selection in phatic communication The present paper focuses on the question ofwhat people talk about when they are not engaged in 'business talk'. In phatic communication, with no first order aim, interactants are ander the constant strain offinding discourse topics, because silence would at least be impolite or embarassing. Solving this problem largely depends on the socio-pragmatic competence ofthe Speakers. It is argued that the choice of topics äs well äs topic linkage can be explained against the background of situational frames, which, like all frames, are representations of common sense knowledge containing hierarchically organized elements that can be determined by experimental methods. The explanation of topic selection and topic linkage rests on the assumption that these elements can become discourse topics in a certain order depending on the nature of the interactantsy (intended) relationship.1 Topic The term 'topic' is not used in this context with reference to a syntactic phenomenon, but rather äs it is used in everyday language, for example, when people summarize conversations. In this sense topic is understood äs a discourse structuring element. Among linguists there seem to be at least two distinct views of what a discourse topic is. McLaughlin (1984: 45 ff) distinguishes between 'referent approaches' http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication de Gruyter

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/topic-selection-in-phatic-communication-tVWx1IZmpT

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Walter de Gruyter
ISSN
0167-8507
eISSN
1613-3684
DOI
10.1515/mult.1987.6.3.247
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the question ofwhat people talk about when they are not engaged in 'business talk'. In phatic communication, with no first order aim, interactants are ander the constant strain offinding discourse topics, because silence would at least be impolite or embarassing. Solving this problem largely depends on the socio-pragmatic competence ofthe Speakers. It is argued that the choice of topics äs well äs topic linkage can be explained against the background of situational frames, which, like all frames, are representations of common sense knowledge containing hierarchically organized elements that can be determined by experimental methods. The explanation of topic selection and topic linkage rests on the assumption that these elements can become discourse topics in a certain order depending on the nature of the interactantsy (intended) relationship.1 Topic The term 'topic' is not used in this context with reference to a syntactic phenomenon, but rather äs it is used in everyday language, for example, when people summarize conversations. In this sense topic is understood äs a discourse structuring element. Among linguists there seem to be at least two distinct views of what a discourse topic is. McLaughlin (1984: 45 ff) distinguishes between 'referent approaches'

Journal

Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communicationde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 1987

There are no references for this article.