Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
7 Lieber's (2004) theory may account for the preponderance of verbs in terms of coindexation failure in the case of certain nominal bases. See her chapter 2 for some discussion
10 Even for intransitive verbs as bases the argument structure approach seems ill-founded
(2003)
Some prefixes may also occur recursively in English, such as great-or re
T. Berg (2003)
Right-branching in English derivational morphologyEnglish Language and Linguistics, 7
A. Akmajian (1979)
Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication
(1988)
The Notion of 'Head' in Morphology
(1984)
Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris
The pertinent quotations can be looked up in the OED
Heike Baeskow (2002)
Abgeleitete Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen und Englischen: Kontrastive Wortbildungsanalysen im Rahmen des Minimalistischen Programms und unter Berücksichtigung sprachhistorischer Aspekte
(1995)
Wortbildung und Kognition: Überlegungen zum deutschen -er Suffix
(2001)
The unitary base hypothesis and the semantics of word-formation rules
Bill Broyles (1907)
NotesEdinburgh Medical Journal, 35
M. Aronoff (1979)
Word Formation in Generative Grammar
16 One notable example of this general trend in syntactic theory is the radical approach in the opposite direction advocated in Borer (in press). See, for example, Baker (2003) for the opposite view
V. Ehrich, Irene Rapp (2000)
Sortale Bedeutung und Argumentstruktur: ung-Nominalislerungen im Deutschen, 19
(1999)
for a detailed discussion of the methodological issues involved in using the OED for the investigation of neologisms and morphological productivity
(1995)
The CELEX Lexical Database
L. Bauer (1988)
Introducing Linguistic Morphology
(1981)
Morphologische (Ir-)Regularitäten. Tübingen: Narr
(2003)
Semantic fragmentation in word-formation: The case of Spanish -azo
Laurence Horn (2002)
Uncovering the UN-Word : A Study in Lexical Pragmatics, 49
(2002)
Analogical Modeling. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Valerie Adams (2001)
Complex Words in English
Tübingen: Niemeyer
which would eliminate one of the four conceivable assumptions concerning the nature of unfrom the scene
G. Booij (2005)
Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology
B. Stiebels (1998)
Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface
Livio Gaeta (2000)
On the interaction between morphology and semantics: the Italian suffix - ATAActa Linguistica Hungarica, 47
G. Booij, J. Marle (1998)
Yearbook of Morphology 1997
J. Caluwe (1994)
Compound Comprehension in Isolation and in Context. The contribution of conceptual and discourse knowledge to the comprehension of German novel noun-noun compounds, 83
Joakim Adilsson (2005)
Word formation in English
A. Krott, R. Baayen, R. Schreuder (2001)
Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in DutchLinguistics, 39
H. Giegerich (2005)
Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects
Mark Baker (2003)
Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives
Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania (Distributor)
J. Pustejovsky (1995)
The Generative LexiconComput. Linguistics, 17
(1998)
does not deal with denominal formations in sufficient detail, and Lieber's (2004) account of -ee is basically a refinement of Barker's
C. Barker (1998)
Episodic-ee in English : A thematic role constraint on new word formationLanguage, 74
Klaus Schneider (2003)
Diminutives in English
(1999)
Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation
(2001)
analyzes -bile '-able' and -oso '-ous', and Gaeta (2000) focuses on the nominal suffix -ata, as in entrata 'entrance' (from entrare 'to enter') or gomitata 'elbow blow
(1990)
Semantic Structures
H. Giegerich (1999)
Lexical strata in English
B. Levin, M. Rappaport (1988)
Nonevent -er nominals: a probe into argument structureLinguistics, 26
S. Anderson (1992)
Where's Morphology?
(1985)
English and Polish Adjectives. A Study in Lexicalist Word-formation
Thomas Becker (1993)
Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology
R. Lieber (2004)
Morphology and Lexical Semantics
H. Marchand (1971)
Categories And Types Of Present Day English Word Formation
I. Plag (1998)
The polysemy of -ize derivatives: On the role of semantics in word formation
12 As pointed out by Horn (2002), this type of formation seems no longer productive in present-day
Plag (2003: chapter 4, with further references) for a summarizing discussion of the complex restrictions that often hold with English affixes
Liesbet Heyvaert (2003)
A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English
Michael Ramscar (2002)
The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a ruleCognitive Psychology, 45
J. Hay, I. Plag (2004)
What Constrains Possible Suffix Combinations? On the Interaction of Grammatical and Processing Restrictions in Derivational MorphologyNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 22
C. Fillmore, Chuck Wooters, Collin Baker (2001)
Building a Large Lexical Databank Which Provides Deep Semantics
(2003)
chapter 3.4) for the significance of neologisms and hapax legomena in word-formation studies
Malka Hovav, B. Levin (1992)
-er Nominals: Implications for the Theory of Argument Structure
R. Beard, T. Becker (1992)
Analogie und morphologische TheorieLanguage, 68
(1994)
The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, on Compact Disc
L. Bauer (1983)
English Word-Formation
C. Muñoz (2003)
Derived nominalizations in -ee: a Role and Reference Grammar based semantic analysisEnglish Language and Linguistics, 7
Liesbet Heyvaert (1997)
Patientive -er nominals, 86
15 Diminutive suffixes seem to be especially prone to recursivity in many languages (including
R. Baayen, Fermín Martín (2005)
Semantic Density and Past-Tense Formation in Three Germanic LanguagesLanguage, 81
(1998)
11 See note 6 for some discussion of the notion of non-volitional participation as taken from Barker
R. Meyer (1993)
Compound comprehension in isolation and in context
M. Ryder (1999)
Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of - er formations in Present-day EnglishEnglish Language and Linguistics, 3
Jhing-Fa Wang, Chung-Hsien Wu (1999)
Proceedings of the 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Taipei, Taiwan, February 10-11, 1999
Miriam Petruck (1996)
FRAME SEMANTICS
17 Incidentally, the same holds for inflectional morphology. See Ramscar (2002) or Baayen & del Prado Martín (2004) for recent approaches to the role of semantics in regular and irregular inflection
Abstract In Standard generative approaches, word-formation rules contain, among other things, Information on the semantics of the suffix and the syntactic category (or word-class) of possible bases. Based on the general assumption that word-class specification of the input is a crucial ingredient of derivational morphology, far-reaching Claims have been made. For example, the unitary base hypothesis (Aronoff 1976) states that word-formation rules can take only bases äs input that share syntactic category Information. This generative position is a reflection of the well-established traditional descriptive practice of talking about affixes äs being, for example, 'deverbal*, 'deadjectival' or 'denominal'. Thus, across the different theoretical camps, the syntactic category of the base is, implicitly or explicitly, assumed to be central to any account of affixal behavior. In the present paper this view is challenged and it is claimed that derivational morphology does not necessarily make reference to syntactic category Information in the input. It will be shown that the word-class specification of the input of word-formation rules creates numerous empirical and theoretical problems that have been largely ignored in the literature. It is argued that there are productive affixes where the syntactic category of potential base words is only a by-product
Folia Linguistica – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.