Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

On how to interpret canonical conditionals in discourse

On how to interpret canonical conditionals in discourse The aim of this article is to examine the possible relations between form and meaning in some formal types of conditionals. To keep the investigation within manageable proportions, the author restricts himself to the three "canonical" forms of conditionals: the types illustrated by I will do it if you help me, I would do it if you helped me and I would have done it if you had helped me. The conclusionfrom the investigation is that these three forms correspond with quite an array ofdifferent interpretations -- thirty-nine in all -- even ifone limits oneself (äs the author does) to the possible-world readings oftwo types of "case-specifying" conditionals, viz. actualization conditionals like You will be punished if you do that and inferential conditionals like If the murder is proved, he will get a life sentence. The thirty-nine interpretations considered all belong to six sets of possible-world readings: the conditional clause ofsuch a case-specifying conditional may befactual, neutral, closed, open, hypothetical or counterfactual L Introduction Declerck & Reed (forthcoming) offer a rieh typology of conditional sentences on the basis of their semantic, pragmatic and functional characteristics. Cutting across this typology is another one, which is based on purely formal http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Literary Semantics de Gruyter

On how to interpret canonical conditionals in discourse

Journal of Literary Semantics , Volume 29 (3) – Jan 1, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/on-how-to-interpret-canonical-conditionals-in-discourse-rPomnTN2X0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the
ISSN
0341-7638
eISSN
1613-3838
DOI
10.1515/jlse.2000.29.3.149
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the possible relations between form and meaning in some formal types of conditionals. To keep the investigation within manageable proportions, the author restricts himself to the three "canonical" forms of conditionals: the types illustrated by I will do it if you help me, I would do it if you helped me and I would have done it if you had helped me. The conclusionfrom the investigation is that these three forms correspond with quite an array ofdifferent interpretations -- thirty-nine in all -- even ifone limits oneself (äs the author does) to the possible-world readings oftwo types of "case-specifying" conditionals, viz. actualization conditionals like You will be punished if you do that and inferential conditionals like If the murder is proved, he will get a life sentence. The thirty-nine interpretations considered all belong to six sets of possible-world readings: the conditional clause ofsuch a case-specifying conditional may befactual, neutral, closed, open, hypothetical or counterfactual L Introduction Declerck & Reed (forthcoming) offer a rieh typology of conditional sentences on the basis of their semantic, pragmatic and functional characteristics. Cutting across this typology is another one, which is based on purely formal

Journal

Journal of Literary Semanticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.