Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Focus in Double Object Constructions

Focus in Double Object Constructions Studies of the English dative alternation during the last three decades have not yet reached an agreement on the proper syntactic analysis of this alternation. The main goal of this article is to show that a study of the information structural properties of certain constructions can provide independent evidence for the adequacy of a particular syntactic analysis. Relying on the empirical adequateness of the argument structural approach to focus structure (Gussenhoven 1984; Selkirk 1995), we use accentual patterns as a test for syntactic representations. We argue that approaches in which any of the semantic arguments in triadic constructions is represented as a syntactic adjunct is not supported from a focus-theoretical perspective. Since double object constructions raise some problems for the overall applicability of the focus rules, a constraint on focus domain formation will be formulated which is not construction specific, but independently motivated. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Linguistics - An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences de Gruyter

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/focus-in-double-object-constructions-q9dzfuQ9mA

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© Walter de Gruyter
ISSN
0024-3949
eISSN
1613-396X
DOI
10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.237
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Studies of the English dative alternation during the last three decades have not yet reached an agreement on the proper syntactic analysis of this alternation. The main goal of this article is to show that a study of the information structural properties of certain constructions can provide independent evidence for the adequacy of a particular syntactic analysis. Relying on the empirical adequateness of the argument structural approach to focus structure (Gussenhoven 1984; Selkirk 1995), we use accentual patterns as a test for syntactic representations. We argue that approaches in which any of the semantic arguments in triadic constructions is represented as a syntactic adjunct is not supported from a focus-theoretical perspective. Since double object constructions raise some problems for the overall applicability of the focus rules, a constraint on focus domain formation will be formulated which is not construction specific, but independently motivated.

Journal

Linguistics - An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciencesde Gruyter

Published: Mar 11, 2005

There are no references for this article.