Since reuse costs are often higher than expected, several approaches to development with reuse have been proposed. Among the most interesting is the idea of frameworks: sets of single components collaborating according to predefined cooperation rules. This approach can have a great impact on the reusability of parts of a software system, but it is not an easy task to give a quantitative measure of this reusability. The existing reusability metrics can be used, but the results are not fully satisfactory, since they do not take into account the peculiar characteristics of a framework and the particular way it is reused (a mix between black box reuse and white box reuse). For these reasons, a set of criteria adapting the traditional reusability metrics is proposed. These criteria try to evaluate the four main factors affecting the reusability of a framework: portability, adaptability, understandability, and confidence.
End of preview. The entire article is 7 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/the-evaluation-of-framework-reusability-fH4OfPeiSn
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
The evaluation of framework reusability
Cardino, Guido; Baruchelli, Francesco; Valerio, Andrea
Follow ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review
, Volume 5 (2)
Association for Computing Machinery – Sep 1, 1997
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
