Tracing garbage collectors traverse references from live program variables, transitively tracing out the closure of live objects. Memory accesses incurred during tracing are essentially random: a given object may contain references to any other object. Since application heaps are typically much larger than hardware caches, tracing results in many cache misses. Technology trends will make cache misses more important, so tracing is a prime target for prefetching.Simulation of Java benchmarks running with the Boehm-De-mers-Weiser mark-sweep garbage collector for a projected hardware platform reveal high tracing overhead (up to 65% of elapsed time), and that cache misses are a problem. Applying Boehm's default prefetching strategy yields improvements in execution time (16% on average with incremental/generational collection for GC-intensive benchmarks), but analysis shows that his strategy suffers from significant timing problems: prefetches that occur too early or too late relative to their matching loads. This analysis drives development of a new prefetching strategy that yields up to three times the performance improvement of Boehm's strategy for GC-intensive benchmark (27% average speedup), and achieves performance close to that of perfect timing ie , few misses for tracing accesses) on some benchmarks. Validating these simulation results with live runs on current hardware produces average speedup of 6% for the new strategy on GC-intensive benchmarks with a GC configuration that tightly controls heap growth. In contrast, Boehm's default prefetching strategy is ineffective on this platform.
End of preview. The entire article is 12 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/software-prefetching-for-mark-sweep-garbage-collection-hardware-D0bf0EplBT
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Software prefetching for mark-sweep garbage collection: hardware analysis and software redesign
Cher, Chen-Yong; Hosking, Antony L.; Vijaykumar, T. N.
Follow ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
, Volume 32 (5)
Association for Computing Machinery – Dec 1, 2004
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
